Contempt of court laws do not protect ex-judges from criticism: IHC
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court Athar Minallah on Friday rejected a petition filed against the PMLN leaders, declaring it non-maintainable and observed that ‘contempt of court’ laws do not apply on criticism of retired judges, even if they retired as chief justices of the country.
A petition had been moved in the IHC seeking contempt of court proceedings against PMLN Vice President Maryam Nawaz and ex-prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi over their statements related to former chief justice Saqib Nisar, Geo TV reported.
Maryam had held a detailed press conference on Wednesday regarding a recently surfaced audio clip
allegedly featuring the retired chief justice issuing directions to wrongfully convict or detain Maryam and PMLN supremo Nawaz Sharif.
Retired chief justice Nisar has already strongly denied that he issued any extra-legal or illegal instructions in any corruption cases against the Sharifs. He has said the audio clip in question has been fabricated and he is contemplating what kind of legal action he will take against it.
After Maryam’s press conference, petitioner Kalsum Khaliq had moved the IHC, arguing that Maryam and Abbasi had tried to scandalise the judiciary through their statements about the retired chief justice. She had asked the court to initiate contempt of court proceedings against both PMLN leaders.
During Friday’s hearing, Justice Athar Minallah noted that the victim, in this case, can claim defamation through the courts. He also remarked that contempt of court laws do not protect from criticism a retired person, even if they are a former chief justice. “First of all, judges are open-minded about criticism. There is no contempt of court for a retired person, even if the person is a former chief justice. Judges are in a very high position and criticism should be welcomed," he said. In the order, the IHC CJ stated that the petitioner was offended over the criticism of the former chief justice.
The IHC said that after retirement, judges are not part of the bench and are common citizens and can approach alternative forums to get justice. “Contempt law can only be used when it is done in the public interest.”
-
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos -
Kanye West's Wife Bianca Censori Shows Off Hidden Talent -
Kate Middleton Has Learnt Her 'lesson' After 'powering Through' -
Will Prince Harry Be A Working Royal Again For Archie, Lilibet’s Royal Prospects? Expert Answers -
Chile In Danger: Deadly Wildfires Kill 20,forced 50,000 To Flee; President Declares ‘State Of Catastrophe’ -
Prince Harry’s Relationship With King Charles 'changes' With Archie, Lilibet’s UK Doors Opening -
Sara Waisglass Addresses Fans Concerns About Recasting In 'Ginny & Georgia' -
Tim Allen Reflects On Stepping Into Mentorship During 'Home Improvement' Gig -
Royal Tensions Rise As King Charles Navigates Prince Harry, William Feud