Washington’s no-show
The Trump administration’s failure to appear at hearings at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on March 21 telegraphs its disregard for international institutions generally and human rights in particular.
Trump officials notified the Commission, which is the independent human rights organ of the Organization of American States, a day before the scheduled hearings that it would not attend. State Department official contended that it would be inappropriate to participate since several of the hearings addressed issues under judicial review: the administration’s executive actions on immigration and its greenlighting of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which are winding their ways through the courts.
But that explanation failed to assuage critics, who argued that Washington’s absence erodes its legitimacy, emboldens authoritarian leaders in the hemisphere to shrug off their own accountability and dodge dialogue and presages broader disengagement with international human rights institutions.
The move represented an abrupt departure from past practice. The United States has a long, bipartisan history of engaging with the Commission, even when the topic is being litigated. Further undermining the administration’s stated excuse, among the hearings scheduled were the country’s failure to respect the rights of asylum seekers - grievances that predate the Trump administration but endure under his watch - and a case about Peruvian-Japanese detention during World War II that is not the subject of pending litigation.
A State Department official sought to offer reassuring words, claiming that the refusal to participate “does not have any bearing on current or future US engagement with the Commission”. But if ongoing litigation were really the driving force behind Washington’s absence, officials could have signalled their respect for the process and the participating parties by attending the meeting and rebuffing questions they deemed inadvisable to answer.
Human rights groups were outraged. Jamil Dakwar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union human rights programme, noted: “This is another worrying sign that the Trump Administration is not only launching an assault on human rights at home, but is also trying to undermine international bodies charged with holding abusive governments accountable.”
And according to Clara Long, US Programme researcher at Human Rights Watch: “In pulling out of this hearing, the United States is offering a negative example for the rest of the countries in the Americas, who show up and engage in the Inter-American system.” The refusal to participate puts the US in the company of other countries whose human rights records it disdains.
Some observers have suggested that the administration’s decision may be more reflective of lax attention to protocols and its staffing of the State Department than outright hostility to the Commission and its mission. But whether the result of intentional snub, dysfunction or different priorities, the move damages US leadership.
“This reduces a lot of the Trump administration’s credibility and legitimacy on human rights issues,” Jose Miguel Vivanco, head of the Americas division of Human Rights Watch, told the Miami Herald.
The administration’s absence didn’t thwart the proceedings, during which groups offered testimony amid the spectacle of empty chairs administration officials were expected to fill, while Commission officials expressed dismay at Washington’s intransigence. Commission Vice President Margarette May Macaulay called the administration’s refusal to show up “a pity”, while Commissioner Paulo Vannuchi lamented the refusal to attend, “which is what would have made it possible for there to be a democratic exchange of opposing views being aired”.
This article has been excerpted from: ‘Why Washington was a no show at human rights hearings’.
Courtesy: Aljazeera.com
-
Kai Trump Reassures Mother Vanessa Trump After Cancer Diagnosis -
Jimmy Kimmel, Other Stars Rally Around Stephen Colbert As 'Late Show' Ends -
Beatrice, Eugenie Get Thrown Into Schizophrenic Relationship: ‘It's Confusing To Them!’ -
Meghan Markle Comes Under Fire For Trying To Make Money Off Of Prince Harry’s Gift -
Via Lemann: Kevin Spacey's Cannes Entry With Uzbek Model Raises Eyebrows -
Google Gemini Gets CapCut Integration For In-app Video Editing -
King Charles Shows Hidden Talent In Northern Ireland -
Drake Gets Dissed By Ex-friend Over 'fake Numbers' Jab -
Anti-monarchy Groups Comes In Guns Blazing: ‘Why Does The Government Give Royals What They Demand?’ -
Queen Camilla Confronts Disturbing Domestic Abuse Crisis -
Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping: JonBenet Ramsey’s Father Warns Savannah Family About Police -
Harry ‘damages’ Prince William’s Sentiments: ‘He’s Irritated The Heir’ -
Quantum Stocks Surge Following US Plans To Award $2 Billion And Take Equity Stakes -
Minister Breaks Silence On Andrew’s Appointment To Trade Envoy He’s Gone To Jail For -
Good News For Kanye West Over The Fate Of His New Show This Summer -
Why Does The Trump Administration Want To Award $2 Billion To Quantum Computing Firms?