SC ends ban on protest by govt employees, labour unions
Suspends BHC order stating high court crossed its jurisdiction
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday suspended the Balochistan High Court (BHC) order and removed the ban on protests by government employees and labour unions.
The court ruled that launching protests and giving calls for protest was the fundamental right of government employees and trade unions.A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed, while hearing the appeal filed by the Balochistan Government Teachers Association, ruled that launching a protest was the fundamental right of every employee.
Habibur Rehman Mardanzai, General Secretary, Balochistan Government Teachers Association, had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court (SC) against the order of the Balochistan High Court passed on December 9, banning the protests of government employees and labour unions.
Appearing on notice, Asma Jehangir, the counsel for petitioners, informed the court that the BHC had banned the protest of labour unions of government organisations on December 9.She submitted that the learned BHC had ruled in its order that if any government employee protested, the chief secretary was required to take action against the employee by filing a treason case against the protester.
The learned counsel further informed the court that in its order, the learned BHC had also ruled if the chief secretary failed to take action against the protesters, he would be proceeded against.Asma Jehangir further contended that government teachers of the province had peacefully observed a hunger strike without ransacking property or causing any loss.
Meanwhile, the court, after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel, ruled that the learned BHC in its ruling had crossed its jurisdiction.The court further ruled that launching a protest or giving a call for protest and forming labour unions was the fundamental right of government employees. The SC suspended the order of BHC and issued notices to the parties concerned and adjourned the hearing for date-in-office.
-
Prince Harry’s Return To The UK With Archie, Lilibet: ‘Will Meghan Finally Pull The Trigger?’ -
Naomi Watts Gets Real About Impact Of Menopause On Her Eyes -
Fears Mount Against Prince Harry: ‘He’ll Record So That He Can Use Every Word’ -
Kristen Stewart Gets Honest About Future Plans -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Under Fresh Scrutiny Over Royal Lodge -
'The West Wing' Actor Timothy Busfield Faces Arrest Warrant Over Allegations Of Child Sexual Abuse -
Mike Tindall Shares Photos With Wife Zara And Prince Harry's Friend -
Iman Honours David Bowie On His 10th Death Anniversary With New Tattoo -
Zara Larsson Makes Provocative Political Statement -
Danielle Brooks Recalls Hilarious Daughter Moment -
Tom Blyth Explains Rationale Behind Choosing 'lighter' Roles -
Prince Harry Wants King Charles To Open His Event -
Buckingham Palace Seeks New King Charles Aide With A Warning About AI Use -
Charlie Heaton Shares His Two Cents On Popular 'Stranger Things' Theory -
Prince Harry Turns Towards Manipulation For Security: ‘Whoever Is Behind It Realise How Counterproductive You Are’ -
‘Exhausting’ Meghan Markle Becomes Delusional As Alienation Threatens To Grow