Elite class gets everything regularized: Demolition of not even a single shanty will be allowed: IHC
Ag APP
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Tuesday observed that everything belonging to the elite class got regularised but everybody talked about supremacy of the law if the matter pertained to a shanty in the federal capital.
This observation came from Chief Justice Athar Minallah during the hearing of a case filed by a citizen against illegal constructions in the Margalla Hills National Park (MHNP) beyond the allotted areas.
Justice Minallah warned that the court won’t allow demolition of even single shanty in the federal capital’s slums and directed the secretary defence to appear before him in person on the next hearing.
The chief justice also instructed the defence secretary and Capital Development Authority (CDA) chairman to submit affidavits regarding the matter.
The court expressed annoyance with the additional attorney general and said he was speaking against the law as there was no rule of law in the federal capital.
The court asked why no disciplinary action was taken against the officials who failed to render their legal responsibility.
The court instructed the federal government and secretary defence to fix responsibility after probing the illegality. The chief justice asked whether a wall could be constructed without approval of CDA.
The court instructed the CDA to get back the possession of golf course and inform it on the next hearing.
The bench observed that even one inch extra construction other than the allotted land could not be tolerated.
The court also inquired what steps had been taken against encroachments in Sector E-10. The representative of defence ministry said the land had been purchased for construction of Defence Complex.
The court said this money belonged to the public and the land was allotted by the state.
Additional attorney general said construction of wall had been stopped on the court directives.
The bench adjourned further hearing till January 11, with above instructions.
Meanwhile, the same court served notices on respondents in a petition challenging the appointment of Director General National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Lahore Jameel Ahmed.
Justice Baber Sattar heard the case filed by a lawyer against the appointment of DG NAB.
The petitioner’s lawyer Barrister Zafarullah adopted the stance that the Supreme Court in its judgment of 2017 had given guidelines for appointments in the NAB.
The top court had also declared a number of appointments illegal in the said decision, he said.
The lawyer said the apex court directives were clear regarding appointments. He said the NAB DG Lahore was appointed against the guidelines of the top court.
The court served notices on respondents and adjourned hearing for two weeks.
-
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price -
Factory Explosion In North China Leaves Eight Dead -
Blac Chyna Opens Up About Her Kids: ‘Disturb Their Inner Child' -
Winter Olympics 2026: Milan Protestors Rally Against The Games As Environmentally, Economically ‘unsustainable’ -
How Long Is The Super Bowl? Average Game Time And Halftime Show Explained -
Natasha Bure Makes Stunning Confession About Her Marriage To Bradley Steven Perry -
ChatGPT Caricature Prompts Are Going Viral. Here’s List You Must Try -
James Pearce Jr. Arrested In Florida After Alleged Domestic Dispute, Falcons Respond -
Cavaliers Vs Kings: James Harden Shines Late In Cleveland Debut Win -
2026 Winter Olympics Snowboarding: Su Yiming Wins Bronze And Completes Medal Set -
Trump Hosts Honduran President Nasry Asfura At Mar-a-Lago To Discuss Trade, Security -
Cuba-Canada Travel Advisory Raises Concerns As Visitor Numbers Decline -
Anthropic Buys 'Super Bowl' Ads To Slam OpenAI’s ChatGPT Ad Strategy -
Prevent Cancer With These Simple Lifestyle Changes