Change in govt led to shift in NAB attitude: SC
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday summoned former leader of the opposition in National Assembly and PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah’s two wives and son Farrukh Shah in bail case on Thursday. A three-member SC bench comprising Justice Mushir Alam, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan heard the post-arrest bail plea filed by Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah. During the course of proceedings, Advocate Makhdoom Ali Khan, counsel for Khursheed Shah said that nothing was found in an earlier inquiry against Khursheed Shah.
The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) should have sought permission from the court for re-inquiry, he added.
Justice Tariq Masood said that unfortunately, the change of government had led to a shift in the attitude of the NAB.
In many cases, the NAB has even refused to file appeals, he added.
He said that NAB always filed appeals against revenue officers (Patwaris) but did not file appeals against influential people.
He said that bail in NAB cases could only be on hardship cases.
The counsel said that the NAB did not disclose the method of asset pricing.
Justice Sardar Tariq asked how the trial would take place if the court wrote details in bail petition.
The counsel said that his client was accused of misuse of power.
Justice Tariq said that the trial court itself could frame charges if the facts came to light.
The counsel said that there was a gap between the NAB's disclosure of income and expenditure.
Justice Tariq said that the mentioned plots were allotted as school land from 1980 to 2011. The school land was converted into residential plots in 2011 and Khursheed Shah bought the plots in 2012, he added.
The counsel said that the sale and purchase of plots and other matters were done according to the law.
The NAB multiplied the value of Khursheed Shah's assets, he added.
Justice Tariq asked the counsel if his client had applied for bail in the high court on the basis of hardship. The counsel replied that no such appeal was filed.
Justice Tariq said that hardship-based bail must first be sought from the high court.
The point of hardship could not be raised directly in the Supreme Court, he added.
The counsel said that post-arrest bail petition was filed in the high court soon after the arrest of his client.
He said that his client had been in jail for last two years.
The court summoned both the wives of Khursheed Shah.
The court also directed Khursheed Shah's son Farrukh Shah to ensure attendance on Thursday.
Sindh Transport Minister Owais Qadir Shah and all the accused were also ordered to appear in the court.
The court also directed all the accused who had been issued bail cancellation notices should also be present tomorrow.
Later, hearing of the case was adjourned till Thursday and the counsel for Khursheed Shah would continue his arguments.
-
King Charles Makes It ‘absolutely Clear’ He Wants To Solve Royal Crisis -
Royal Family Warned To ‘have Answers’ Amid Weak Standing -
Marc Anthony On Why Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Mattered -
Kid Rock Gets Honest About Bad Bunny’s Performance At Super Bowl -
Kylie Jenner Reveals Real Story Behind Her 'The Moment' Casting -
Eva Mendes Reveals One Costar She Envied Ryan Gosling Over -
Halsey Marks Fiancé Avan Jogia's Birthday With Emotional Note -
China: Stunning Drone Show Lights Up Night Sky Ahead Of Spring Festival 2026 -
Andrew's Epstein Scandal: Will King Charles Abdicate Following King Edward's Footsteps? -
Billy Joel Leaves Loved Ones Worried With His 'dangerous' Comeback -
Prince William Dodges Humiliating Question In Saudi Arabia -
Dax Shepard Describes 'peaceful' Feeling During Near-fatal Crash -
Steve Martin Says THIS Film Has His Most Funny Scene -
Kensington Palace Shares Update As Prince William Continues Saudi Arabia Visit -
Fugitive Crypto Scammer Jailed For 20 Years In $73m Global Fraud -
Will Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Finally Go To Jail Now That King Charles Has Spoken Out? Expert Answers