Why reward police for what they’re paid for: LHC
LAHORE: Lahore High Court Chief Justice Muhammad Qasim Khan on Wednesday expressed his displeasure at the Punjab government’s decision to reward police officials for arresting the prime suspect in the Motorway gang-rape case.
The Chief Justice, who was hearing a case pertaining to the alleged illegal occupation of a government land by the police, questioned as to why the police should be rewarded for arresting suspect Abid Malhi when it was their duty.
"Is it not the job of the police to catch a criminal? If they don't do that, what will they do? This is a new technique by the Punjab government,” the CJ wondered. “Under what law, the reward has been announced by the government?”
On the court’s order, Punjab IGP Inam Ghani was present in the courtroom. Petitioners in the land grab case had said that an elite police training center was built on a 72-kanal government land owned by the Evacuee Trust Property Board. They had complained to the court that the police were harassing them by sending officers of the Special Branch to the board office.
The Chief Justice had directed them to submit a written request to the IGP for the registration of the FIR against the officers. He had asked the petitioners to approach this court if a case was not registered on their complaint.
Justice Khan remarked that police officers were known for their involvement in land grabbing but now they had illegally occupied a government land. Justice Khan also reprimanded the IGP, saying "It is strange that police are being rewarded for arresting a culprit." The police are responsible for lawlessness in the country and on the rampage to plunder national resources with impunity. The country has become a police state, he added.
"If this continues, policemen will first wait for a reward announcement and then nab suspects," the judge remarked.
The federal law officer told the court that the training center had been built on the land of the Evacuee Trust Property Board to which Justice Khan said it was a trust property and the federal government was not authorized to dish out it to anyone. The proceedings were adjourned until Nov 3.
-
Prince Harry's Lawyer Tells Court Daily Mail Complicit In Unlawful Acts -
Meghan Markle Named In Epstein Files With Ghislaine Maxwell? -
Drunk Driver Tries To Snatch San Diego Deputy’s Gun During Chase -
After Surgery, Piers Morgan Reminded Of His Remarks About Meghan's Father's Hospitalization -
Idris Elba Gets Honest About Managing Real-life Hijack Situation -
Royal Family Buries King Charles' Cousin -
Elizabeth Hurley Faces An Impossible Choice As Son Damian, Beau Billy Ray Cyrus Clash -
Rare Pokémon Cards Worth $100k Stolen In New York Shop Robbery -
Chevy Chase Shares Disappointment After 'SNL50: The Anniversary Special' Snub -
Samuel L. Jackson's Old Movie Found New Life: Here's How -
Nobel Prize Snub Hardens Donald Trump's Tone On ‘peace’ -
What's Prince Harry's Case Against The Daily Mail's Publisher? -
'Matilda' Star Mara Wilson Breaks Silence On AI's 'deepfake Apocalypse' After Being Abused -
Meghan Markle 'ruined' Prince Harry's Life? -
Super Bowl Halftime Show Gets Another Attraction Besides Bad Bunny -
Princess Irene's Coffin Arrives For Funeral Rites