India takes first Rafale delivery in controversial jet deal

PARIS: India received Tuesday the first of 36 Rafale fighter jets ordered from France in 2016 in a multi-billion-dollar deal that Paris hopes will unlock more sales despite being tainted by suspicion of corruption. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh joined his French counterpart Florence Parly for a ceremony at the Dassault Aviation factory in Merignac, near the southwestern city of Bordeaux, on the Indian Air Force´s birthday. Standing next to the plane, decorated in the colours of the Indian flag, Singh hailed an "historic and landmark day for the Indian armed forces," noting the Rafale "will add to the strength of our air force." India, which in February fought air battles with arch-rival Pakistan over their shared territory of Kashmir, is seeking to renew its ageing fleet of Jaguar, Mirage 2000, Sukhoi 30, and Mig 21 and 27 jets.

It signed a deal in 2016 to buy 36 Rafales from France, but delivery has been held up by corruption allegations levelled by the opposition Congress party.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has accused Congress of undermining the country´s security, saying the Kashmir skirmishes would have ended "better" for India if it had had the Rafales.

French plane-maker Dassault in 2012 won a contract negotiated under a Congress-led government in 2012 to supply 126 jets to India, with some built in France and the rest in India by state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

But on a visit to France in 2015, Modi scrapped the deal, replacing it with an order for 36 jets -- all to be built in France. The deal was estimated to be worth $9.4 billion (8.5 billion euros) at the time.

The new agreement, signed the following year, named Reliance group, a conglomerate owned by billionaire Anil Ambani that has little experience in aviation, as Dassault´s local partner.

Ambani is reported to be close to India´s governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party.

Modi and the government deny any misconduct, and in December, India´s top court dismissed calls for an investigation into the deal, saying it saw no evidence of "commercial favouritism".