Al-Azizia reference: Wajid submits details of cheques received by Maryam from Nawaz
ISLAMABAD: The joint investigation team (JIT) head Wajid Zia Friday continued with his statement in Al-Azizia/Hill Metal Establishment corruption reference amid a strained environment between prosecution and the defence.
Counsel for Nawaz Sharif Khawaja Haris was raising objections over the admissibility and relevance of the documents that Wajid Zia had been producing. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Deputy Prosecutor General (DPG) Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi had been contending that the defence counsel not letting the statement complete with his objections over every sentence of the witness.
It is to be mentioned here that previously, when Khawaja Haris was cross-examining Wajid Zia and Investigation Officer (IO) Imran Dogar in Avenfield apartments corruption reference, the NAB DPG was consistently raising objections, insisting that these objections must be recorded and on that particular time, Haris was complaining about the inappropriate attitude to the prosecution.
During Friday’s proceedings, Wajid Zia produced before the court cheques that Nawaz Sharif received from Hussain Nawaz and Hill Metal Establishment Jeddah and also cheques he gave to his daughter Maryam Nawaz.
Wajid Zia also produced a letter of Qatari Prince Hamad bin Jasim that he had written to the JIT. The letter was made part of the judicial record. The prosecution also sought the court’s permission to submit some documents that came in response to the JIT’s mutual legal assistance applications to the UAE authorities.
Khawaja Haris however objected that these documents are not part of the reference. A NAB prosecutor Malik Wasiq sought the court’s permission to submit four cheques of the Standard Chartered Bank as evidence. Khawaja Haris said Zia had never been custodian to that record and he also did not execute those cheques. He said producing the same before the court would be a futile exercise.
Initially when Zia started recording of his evidence, he took a start from the statements of Hussain Nawaz, Hassan Nawaz and Maryam Nawaz that they had submitted before the Supreme Court.
-
Chinese New Year Explained: All You Need To Know About The Year Of The Horse -
Canadian Passport Holders Can Now Travel To China Visa-free: Here's How -
Glen Powell Reveals Wild Prank That Left Sister Hunting Jail Cells -
Edmonton Weather Warning: Up To 30 Cm Of Snow Possible In Parts Of Alberta -
'A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms' Episode 5: What Time It Airs And Where To Stream -
Amy Schumer Drops Cryptic Message On First Valentine Amid Divorce -
Savannah Guthrie Sends Desperate Plea To Mom Nancy Kidnapper -
NBA All-Star 2026 Shake-up: Inside The New USA Vs World Tournament Format -
Warner Bros Consider Reopening Deal Talks With Paramount, Says Reports -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Faces Future With UK MPs, Says Expert -
Eva Mendes Shared Bedroom Photos For Ryan Gosling On Valentine’s -
Shamed Andrew Told 'nobody Is Above The Law' Amid Harrowing Silence -
Gisele Bundchen Melts Hearts With Sweet Bike Ride Glimpse Featuring Son -
Prince William Found Meghan Markle ‘quite Refreshing’ At Start -
Kate Middleton Knew Should Could Not Be ‘voice Of Reason’ With Prince Harry -
Rihanna Has Wardrobe Malfunction At A$AP Rocky Fashion Show