Al-Azizia reference: Wajid submits details of cheques received by Maryam from Nawaz
ISLAMABAD: The joint investigation team (JIT) head Wajid Zia Friday continued with his statement in Al-Azizia/Hill Metal Establishment corruption reference amid a strained environment between prosecution and the defence.
Counsel for Nawaz Sharif Khawaja Haris was raising objections over the admissibility and relevance of the documents that Wajid Zia had been producing. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Deputy Prosecutor General (DPG) Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi had been contending that the defence counsel not letting the statement complete with his objections over every sentence of the witness.
It is to be mentioned here that previously, when Khawaja Haris was cross-examining Wajid Zia and Investigation Officer (IO) Imran Dogar in Avenfield apartments corruption reference, the NAB DPG was consistently raising objections, insisting that these objections must be recorded and on that particular time, Haris was complaining about the inappropriate attitude to the prosecution.
During Friday’s proceedings, Wajid Zia produced before the court cheques that Nawaz Sharif received from Hussain Nawaz and Hill Metal Establishment Jeddah and also cheques he gave to his daughter Maryam Nawaz.
Wajid Zia also produced a letter of Qatari Prince Hamad bin Jasim that he had written to the JIT. The letter was made part of the judicial record. The prosecution also sought the court’s permission to submit some documents that came in response to the JIT’s mutual legal assistance applications to the UAE authorities.
Khawaja Haris however objected that these documents are not part of the reference. A NAB prosecutor Malik Wasiq sought the court’s permission to submit four cheques of the Standard Chartered Bank as evidence. Khawaja Haris said Zia had never been custodian to that record and he also did not execute those cheques. He said producing the same before the court would be a futile exercise.
Initially when Zia started recording of his evidence, he took a start from the statements of Hussain Nawaz, Hassan Nawaz and Maryam Nawaz that they had submitted before the Supreme Court.
-
World's Biggest Fish Market Is Set To Open In Sydney: First Look Revealed -
Ariana Grande, Jonathan Bailey Reuniting For THIS Project -
Sydney Sweeney Saved Herself From Brutal Roast: Here's How -
Prince Harry’s ‘unrealistic’ Hopes Get Dashed: ‘Sincerity For King Charles Is Under Question’ -
Meghan Markle's New Product Sells Out Within Minutes -
Revealed: Who Leonardo DiCaprio Was Talking To In Viral Golden Globe Video -
Prince William Represents King Charles At Windsor Castle Ceremony -
'Hotel Transylvania 5' Gets Major Update By Film's Star -
PlayStation Plus Adds Over 300 Hours Of Gameplay Across Massive New Titles -
Mandy Moore On Mom Friendships Amid Ashley Tisdale's Mom Group Claims -
Justin Baldoni Objects To Removing Taylor Swift's Name From Case -
Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Warned About Royal Titles After They Turn Down Prince William's Request -
Samsung One UI 8.5 Adds Fully Customisable Unlock Animations -
Injured By Bullets, New York Father-son Duo Beat Alleged Gunman With A Bat -
Annular Solar Eclipse 2026: Here's Everything To Know About The ‘ring Of Fire’ -
Blake Lively Gives Up Hopes Of Taylor Swift Reconciliation?