SC questions govt’s authority to implement Kissan Package
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the government’s authority by implementing Kissan Package without approval of the Parliament.
A two-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal heard the federal government appeal against December 8, 2015 judgment of the Peshawar High Court which had ruled that there should be no discrimination in distribution of subsidy to fertilizer producers.
The court asked the Attorney General to argue today (Thursday) as to whether the government could issue funds without approval of the Parliament.
During the course of hearing Justice Qazi Faez Isa questioned as to whether the government has authority to issue such funds without the approval of the Parliament. He said that approval for the supplementary grant must be obtained besides the financial budget.
“It seems the government is by-passing the Parliament when billions of rupees for Kissan package were issued without any law”, Justice Isa remarked adding that if the Parliament does not approve the supplementary grant then who would deposit this money in the national kitty.
He further observed that when the government has majority in the Parliament then why it had not obtained the approval of Kissan package.We would have no objection that after the Parliament’s approval the government may spend Rs20 billion in one day, Justice Qazi Faez Isa said adding that the money in the national exchequer is of public taxes, adding the national exchequer is not of any individual.
The court questioned why Kissan package was not tabled in the Parliament and why the legislature had been by-passed. Similarly, the court observed that it was not the prerogative of the government to issue billions of rupees without Parliament approval.
Th Counsel representing Pak-China Fertilizer said that the government had made discrimination in granting subsidy. Justice Qazi asked the attorney general to recommend to the government to legislate laws for subsidy, adding if there is no law presently then everyone should be given subsidy. Attorney general Ashtar Ausaf submitted that they would consider the court proposal however, he said the subsidy is given through notification. Later, the court adjourned the hearing till today (Thursday).
-
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein -
Miranda Kerr Shares The One Wellness Practice She Does With Her Kids -
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15 -
Khloe Kardashian Shares How She And Her Sisters Handle Money Between Themselves -
Prince William Ready To End 'shielding' Of ‘disgraced’ Andrew Amid Epstein Scandal -
Chris Hemsworth Hailed By Halle Berry For Sweet Gesture