Musharraf warned of non-bailable arrest warrants
Non-appearance before court
By our correspondents
February 21, 2015
ISLAMABAD: The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Judge, Islamabad, Sohail Ikram, during the course of hearing into the judges detention case against Pervez Musharraf remarked that the attitude of former president for appearing in the court was not right and observed as to why the court should not issue his non-bailable arrest warrants.
The ATC judge, Islamabad, took up for hearing the judges detention case against former president Pervez Musharraf on Friday.Ilyas Siddqui, counsel for Pervez Musharraf, could not appear in the court and his junior lawyer Rana Jamil and public before the court. Counsel for Pervez Musharraf told the court that senior lawyer Ilyas Siddiqui who was to complete his arguments on the petition seeking permanent exemption for Pervez Musharraf from attendance in the court was engaged in a case in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he requested the court to adjourn the hearing of the case.
The judge while expressing resentment remarked that judges’ detention case had been pending in the court for one and a half years and counsel for the former president was not completing his arguments nor the petition seeking permanent exemption for former president was being debated.The court while accepting plea for exemption of one day from court attendance in respect of Pervez Musharraf adjourned the hearing of the case till February, 27.
The ATC judge, Islamabad, took up for hearing the judges detention case against former president Pervez Musharraf on Friday.Ilyas Siddqui, counsel for Pervez Musharraf, could not appear in the court and his junior lawyer Rana Jamil and public before the court. Counsel for Pervez Musharraf told the court that senior lawyer Ilyas Siddiqui who was to complete his arguments on the petition seeking permanent exemption for Pervez Musharraf from attendance in the court was engaged in a case in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he requested the court to adjourn the hearing of the case.
The judge while expressing resentment remarked that judges’ detention case had been pending in the court for one and a half years and counsel for the former president was not completing his arguments nor the petition seeking permanent exemption for former president was being debated.The court while accepting plea for exemption of one day from court attendance in respect of Pervez Musharraf adjourned the hearing of the case till February, 27.
-
Northern Lights: Calm Conditions Persist Amid Low Space Weather Activity -
'Look What Andrew Has Done': Meghan Markle Defended On Jeremy Vine Show -
Apple, Google Agree To Make 'app Store' Changes Over UK Regulator Concerns -
Autodesk Files Lawsuit Against Google Over AI Video Tool Trademark Dispute -
San Francisco 49ers Player Shot Near Post-Super Bowl Party -
Kardashian-Jenner Clan Brings Lewis Hamilton Into The Fold: Watch -
Meghan Markle 'quietly Dreaded' As Ex-best Friend Receives Lucrative Offer For Bombshell Memoir About Duchess -
Blake Shelton, Gwen Stefani Make Big Move To Save Their Marriage -
Google Warns Of State-sponsored Cyberattacks Targeting Defense Sector Employees -
Ransom Deadline Passes: FBI Confirms ‘communication Blackout’ In Nancy Guthrie Abduction -
Jeff Bezos Hints At Blue Origin Moon Plans As Elon Musk Responds With Cautious Praise -
Zach Bryan Slams Turning Point USA Alternative Halftime Show: 'Embarrassing As Hell' -
South Korea Blames Coupang Data Breach On 'management Failures,' Not Cyber Attack -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew More Concerned About ‘issue Of His Legacy’ Than Epstein Links -
Instagram Plans New Snapchat-style App ‘Instants’ Amid Rising AR Competition -
Safer Internet Day 2026: Is Social Media Ban The Only Way To Protect Kids?