SHC reserves judgment on plea against
direct appointments of education board officers
Karachi
The Sindh High Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on petitions against the provincial government’s decision on direct appointments of secretaries and controllers for the intermediate, secondary and technical boards of the province.
Prof Anwar Ahmed Zai, Dr Masroor Ahmed Zai and others officers who were working as controllers of examinations and chairmen for different intermediate, secondary and technical boards of the province had challenged the proposed direct appointment through advertisements and a competitive process.
They submitted that the secretary to the chief minister for universities and boards had published advertisements for appointment of secretaries and controllers for the intermediate and secondary education boards of the province outside the service cadre of the post, which was not authorised as per the law and rules.
The petitioners contended that they were appointed by the competent authority and were qualified to be promoted as they were senior officers of their respective boards.
The provincial government, on the other hand, contended that the creditability of the educational boards of the province has been under question for long as allegations of favouritism, nepotism, result tampering and declining standards continue to pour in.
Thus, the government had decided in principle to induct professionals and qualified people through merit-based competition.
The provincial law officer submitted that the respondents who were holding the post of education board chairman or controller could also avail these opportunities if they were genuinely eligible for the post.
He submitted that all education boards in Sindh, except Hyderabad, have been working without a process of competitive, merit-based selection, with officers simply being chosen and appointed on a contract basis.
The law officer added that it was for this reason that the controlling authority reviewed all the appointments and decided that all hiring done without the due procedure be cancelled.
After hearing the arguments, the SHC division bench headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar reserved judgment over the matter.
-
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein