NAB asked to conclude arguments in Qasim Zia case
LAHORE A division bench of the Lahore High Court on Thursday asked the counsel for National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to conclude his arguments on September 17 about bail petition of PPP’s senior leader Qasim Zia facing charges of fraud. Earlier, the bureau’s counsel told the bench that the prime suspect
By our correspondents
September 11, 2015
LAHORE
A division bench of the Lahore High Court on Thursday asked the counsel for National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to conclude his arguments on September 17 about bail petition of PPP’s senior leader Qasim Zia facing charges of fraud.
Earlier, the bureau’s counsel told the bench that the prime suspect of the scam, Ali Usman had been arrested. He said the suspect told the interrogators that Qasim Zia was equally involved in the fraud. The counsel said the suspect also revealed that the politician used to withdraw money from the company’s account for his election campaign. He said Qasim Zia had already submitted an application for voluntarily return; therefore, the bail petition should be dismissed. The bench asked the NAB counsel to come up on next hearing with his final arguments along with relevant record. Qasim Zia through his counsel stated in the petition that he had left the company “Ali Usman Brokerage” seven years before it committed the alleged fraud. The counsel said the NAB officials kept his client in custody for 16 days but failed to establish his involvement in the scam. He said the case was a result of mere political victimisation.
A division bench of the Lahore High Court on Thursday asked the counsel for National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to conclude his arguments on September 17 about bail petition of PPP’s senior leader Qasim Zia facing charges of fraud.
Earlier, the bureau’s counsel told the bench that the prime suspect of the scam, Ali Usman had been arrested. He said the suspect told the interrogators that Qasim Zia was equally involved in the fraud. The counsel said the suspect also revealed that the politician used to withdraw money from the company’s account for his election campaign. He said Qasim Zia had already submitted an application for voluntarily return; therefore, the bail petition should be dismissed. The bench asked the NAB counsel to come up on next hearing with his final arguments along with relevant record. Qasim Zia through his counsel stated in the petition that he had left the company “Ali Usman Brokerage” seven years before it committed the alleged fraud. The counsel said the NAB officials kept his client in custody for 16 days but failed to establish his involvement in the scam. He said the case was a result of mere political victimisation.
-
Jennifer Aniston Already Decided Her Wedding Dress? -
Prince Harry, Meghan’s Hollywood Party Drama Exposes Chaotic PR Strategy -
Jennifer Garner Reacts To Savannah Guthrie's Video As Search For Nancy Guthrie Continues -
Bad Bunny Leaves Fans Worried With Major Move After Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Captain Jason Talks Personal Hardships He Faced Ahead Of 'Below Deck' Season 4 -
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California