Notices issued on plea against delimitation
LAHOREThe Lahore High Court on Tuesday directed the Election Commission of Pakistan and the Punjab government to explain whether the court could interfere into the matter of delimitations after the schedules for local government elections had been issued. A two-judge bench comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Shujaat Ali
By our correspondents
September 09, 2015
LAHORE
The Lahore High Court on Tuesday directed the Election Commission of Pakistan and the Punjab government to explain whether the court could interfere into the matter of delimitations after the schedules for local government elections had been issued.
A two-judge bench comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Shujaat Ali Khan heard the case and issued notices to the ECP and the Punjab government both for September 10. Arshad and other voters from different union councils had challenged the new delimitations. The petitioners stated that new delimitations had caused serious problems for voters as votes of a ward had been registered in another ward. The complexities have been created by the new delimitations which were also the violation of Section 10 of the Local Government Act, they contended.
They told the bench that the delimitation officer had also rejected their applications while a single bench of the LHC also rejected their petitions. To it, a law officer on behalf of the Punjab government told the bench that the new delimitations were in accordance with the law and were in the light of a Supreme Court order. However, the bench issued notices and asked law officers to assist the court on the matter.
The Lahore High Court on Tuesday directed the Election Commission of Pakistan and the Punjab government to explain whether the court could interfere into the matter of delimitations after the schedules for local government elections had been issued.
A two-judge bench comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Shujaat Ali Khan heard the case and issued notices to the ECP and the Punjab government both for September 10. Arshad and other voters from different union councils had challenged the new delimitations. The petitioners stated that new delimitations had caused serious problems for voters as votes of a ward had been registered in another ward. The complexities have been created by the new delimitations which were also the violation of Section 10 of the Local Government Act, they contended.
They told the bench that the delimitation officer had also rejected their applications while a single bench of the LHC also rejected their petitions. To it, a law officer on behalf of the Punjab government told the bench that the new delimitations were in accordance with the law and were in the light of a Supreme Court order. However, the bench issued notices and asked law officers to assist the court on the matter.
-
Real Reason Prince William, Kate Broke Silence On Andrew Scandal Revealed -
Drew Barrymore Responds To 'Charlie's Angels' Costar's Comments About Her -
Shakira Slips Hard On Stage During Life Show -
King Charles Speaks Out Over Andrew's Scandal: 'Stand Ready To Help Police' -
Dax Shepard Recalls Horrifying Accident That Almost Killed Him -
Logan Paul's Bodyguard Hits Fan On Super Bowl Day -
Epstein Files: Anne Hathaway Mentioned As Highly Desired Guest For Bill Gates? -
Prince Harry Under A Lot Of Stress As Meghan Markle Makes Bizarre Demands -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie's Subtle Break From Disgraced Parents Exposed -
Baby Left In Running Bathtub Dies After Father ‘forgets’ Him -
King Charles Takes A Major Step To Keep Horrified Prince William Out Of The Loop On Andrew: Insider -
Taylor Swift Set To Make Biggest Cut From Her Wedding Guest: Blake Lively Or Ryan Reynolds -
Prince William Meets Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman -
Brooklyn Beckham Brutally Cuts Off Inner Circle Amid Feud With David, Victoria -
Kaley Cuoco Reveals Why Fiance Tom Pelphrey Sleeps In Seperate Room -
Ghislaine Maxwell Will Not Answer Congress Questions On Epstein