NA-122 rigging case verdict reserved
LAHOREAn election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments. PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the
By our correspondents
August 18, 2015
LAHORE
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
-
What You Need To Know About Ischemic Stroke -
Shocking Reason Behind Type 2 Diabetes Revealed By Scientists -
SpaceX Cleared For NASA Crew-12 Launch After Falcon 9 Review -
Meghan Markle Gives Old Hollywood Vibes In New Photos At Glitzy Event -
Simple 'finger Test' Unveils Lung Cancer Diagnosis -
Groundbreaking Treatment For Sepsis Emerges In New Study -
Roblox Blocked In Egypt Sparks Debate Over Child Safety And Digital Access -
Savannah Guthrie Addresses Ransom Demands Made By Her Mother Nancy's Kidnappers -
OpenAI Reportedly Working On AI-powered Earbuds As First Hardware Product -
Andrew, Sarah Ferguson Refuse King Charles Request: 'Raising Eyebrows Inside Palace' -
Adam Sandler Reveals How Tom Cruise Introduced Him To Paul Thomas Anderson -
Washington Post CEO William Lewis Resigns After Sweeping Layoffs -
North Korea To Hold 9th Workers’ Party Congress In Late February -
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price