NA-122 rigging case verdict reserved
LAHOREAn election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments. PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the
By our correspondents
August 18, 2015
LAHORE
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
-
OpenAI And ServiceNow Team Up To Embed ChatGPT In Business Workflows -
Johnny Depp Prepares For His Massive Comeback After Years Of Struggle -
Meghan Markle Is Ready To Put A Cork In It All By Giving Prince Harry Baby No. 3: ‘She Wants A Break’ -
Billie Eilish Speaks Out Against Authority: 'It's Very Strange' -
'Greenland Will Stay Greenland', Former Trump Adviser Hints At New Twist -
Brooklyn Beckham's Wedding Dance With Mom Victoria Sparks Hilarious Memes -
King Charles' Latest Photos A Statement On His Health? -
Tom Cruise's Biggest Dream Crushed By The President? -
King Charles, Queen Camilla Send Message To King Of Spain After Train Crash -
'We Believe Brooklyn': David Beckham Trolled After Son's Statement -
Microsoft CEO Says AI Must Deliver Real World Impact To Survive -
Stranger Knocks, Then Opens Fire On Indiana Judge And Wife -
Priscilla Presley's Derogatory Remarks On Late Daughter Lisa Marie Reignite Controversy -
Japan Unveils Anti-ship Missile With ‘barrel-roll’ Evasion To Outsmart Defenses -
How Brooklyn Beckham 'mentor' Prince Harry Inspiring Him To Speak Against Family? -
Zac Efron, Kenny Ortega Revisit 'High School Musical' After 2 Decades