NA-122 rigging case verdict reserved
LAHOREAn election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments. PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the
By our correspondents
August 18, 2015
LAHORE
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
An election tribunal Monday reserved verdict in NA-122 alleged rigging case after counsel for National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq concluded his arguments.
PTI chairman Imran Khan had filed an election petition before the tribunal challenging the victory of Sadiq in 2013 elections. Khan alleged that the victory of the returned candidate was a result of massive rigging.
Barrister Asjad Saeed, the speaker’s counsel, in his final arguments stated that reports of all inspections carried out by local commission and National Database and Regulatory Authority (Nadra) found no rigging element from the election record of the constituency.
To a tribunal’s query about counterfoils recovered without thumb impressions and identity card numbers of the voters, the counsel said the result of the election would remain same even if the votes cast against those counterfoils excluded from the total count. He pointed out that the total sum of doubtful counterfoils was 1124 only.
Barrister Saeed said the petitioner, Imran Khan, did not mention his allegations about alleged rigging in NA-122 before the judicial commission formed by the government on the PTI’s demand.
He said Nadra chairman stated before the commission that the proportion of valid polling in country was 97 per cent. Whereas, he said, the Nadra chairman, when appeared before the tribunal, had maintained that proportion of the valid votes in NA-122 was 99 per cent.
He said the alleged irregularities committed by the election staff could not be attributed to the returned candidate. He said his client was not the beneficiary of the alleged irregularities but the PTI chief, Imran Khan, the petitioner. If there was no irregularity, Khan would not have any ground for his petition, the counsel added.
Barrister Saeed said the PTI chief accused presiding officers of corrupt practices but never asked the tribunal to summon them for their witness in the case. He said the tribunal could not give any decision against the election officers without hearing them. In this case, counsel of Imran Khan had already concluded his arguments. The tribunal would announce the verdict in both cases, NA-122 and PP-147, on Saturday.
-
Rachel Lindsay Slams Ex Bryan Abasolo For Lying About Her Fertility Struggles -
Prince William's Ongoing Nightmare With Andrew Takes A New Turn -
Selena Gomez Reveals Sweet Reason For Wanting Big Family Revealed On Podcast -
Zendaya Revealed One Accent She Would Like To Pull Off One Day After Taking Major Step With Tom Holland -
Starlink Bridges Digital Divide: Global Internet Now Reaching World’s Most Remote Regions -
'An Avengers Movie Every 20 Minutes': Seth MacFarlane Gets Candid About Taxing 'Ted' Production -
Prince William, Kate Middleton 'drastic Measures' For Future Of Monarchy Exposed As Pressure Mounts -
David, Victoria Beckham Send Lovely Birthday Wishes To Son Brooklyn Despite Feud -
'Sinners' Star Recalls One Of The Coolest Scenes From Filming -
Eco-fashion Designer Amanda Navaian Sues King Charles Charity -
MGK's Flirty Comment On Megan Fox's Sultry Pics Fuels Reunion Buzz -
'He Was Really Reminiscing': Clinton Sparks Reactions After Being Caught Smiling At Epstein Photos -
NASA Restructures Artemis Mission, Pushing First Lunar Landing To 2028 -
Young Sebastian Bach: Wild Photos From His Long-haired Rock Star Era Amid Christina Applegate Confession -
Royal Family All Set To Show Unity As King Charles 'plans Abdication' -
Astronomers Spot Nearly Invisible Galaxy Packed With Dark Matter