Rejecting Iran deal would spell war: Obama
WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama made a vigorous case for his nuclear deal with Iran on Wednesday, warning lawmakers that rejecting diplomacy would lead to war and destroy US credibility.Casting the debate over the agreement with Tehran as “the most consequential foreign policy debate” in a decade, Obama said Congress must
By our correspondents
August 06, 2015
WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama made a vigorous case for his nuclear deal with Iran on Wednesday, warning lawmakers that rejecting diplomacy would lead to war and destroy US credibility.
Casting the debate over the agreement with Tehran as “the most consequential foreign policy debate” in a decade, Obama said Congress must not waver under pressure from critics whom he said history had already proven wrong.
“Many of the same people who argued for the war in Iraq are now making the case against the Iran nuclear deal,” he said, urging lawmakers to instead choose an American tradition of strong diplomacy.
“Congressional rejection of this deal leaves any US administration that is absolutely committed to preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon with one option: another war in the Middle East.
“If Congress kills this deal, we will lose more than just constraints on Iran’s nuclear programme or the sanctions we have painstakingly built,” he warned.
“We will have lost something more precious. America’s credibility as a leader of diplomacy. America’s credibility as the anchor of the international system.”
Positing the now unpopular Iraq war as a cautionary tale, Obama recalled president John F. Kennedy’s diplomatic efforts to engage a nuclear Soviet Union as a more worthy example to follow.
Obama’s remarks came at the American University, in Washington, where in 1963 Kennedy used a commencement address to argue vehemently for peace with the Soviet Union in the face of panic over a nuclear conflagration.
Speaking a year after the Cuban missile crisis, Kennedy cautioned against brandishing US power to bring about a the “peace of the grave or the security of the slave.”
Instead, he announced diplomatic efforts to check “one of the greatest hazards which man faces in 1963, the further spread of nuclear arms.”
Casting the debate over the agreement with Tehran as “the most consequential foreign policy debate” in a decade, Obama said Congress must not waver under pressure from critics whom he said history had already proven wrong.
“Many of the same people who argued for the war in Iraq are now making the case against the Iran nuclear deal,” he said, urging lawmakers to instead choose an American tradition of strong diplomacy.
“Congressional rejection of this deal leaves any US administration that is absolutely committed to preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon with one option: another war in the Middle East.
“If Congress kills this deal, we will lose more than just constraints on Iran’s nuclear programme or the sanctions we have painstakingly built,” he warned.
“We will have lost something more precious. America’s credibility as a leader of diplomacy. America’s credibility as the anchor of the international system.”
Positing the now unpopular Iraq war as a cautionary tale, Obama recalled president John F. Kennedy’s diplomatic efforts to engage a nuclear Soviet Union as a more worthy example to follow.
Obama’s remarks came at the American University, in Washington, where in 1963 Kennedy used a commencement address to argue vehemently for peace with the Soviet Union in the face of panic over a nuclear conflagration.
Speaking a year after the Cuban missile crisis, Kennedy cautioned against brandishing US power to bring about a the “peace of the grave or the security of the slave.”
Instead, he announced diplomatic efforts to check “one of the greatest hazards which man faces in 1963, the further spread of nuclear arms.”
-
'Mortified' Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Plan Interview To Finally Speak Truth In Sarah Ferguson, Andrew-Epstein Scandal -
Lewis Hamilton Spent Years Trying To Catch Kim Kardashian's Attention? -
Royal Strategy Revealed As King Charles, Prince William Issue Statements On Andrew Row -
Inside Will Smith's Struggle To Revive His Career After Infamous Oscar Incident -
What’s Coming Out Of Meghan Markle’s War Against Prince William? Inside People’s Unease -
Australia Seeks Urgent Meeting With Roblox Over 'Disturbing' Content Complaints -
Epstein Case: Ghislaine Maxwell Invokes Fifth, Refuses To Testify Before US Congress -
Ferrari Luce: First Electric Sports Car Unveiled With Enzo V12 Revival -
Chappell Roan Parts Ways With Wasserman Music Over CEO's Ties With Epstein -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Publically Shamed After Brother And Nephew Change Decades Old Royal Rule -
Jon Stewart On Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance: 'Killed It'' -
Savannah Guthrie Receives Massive Support From Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Garner After Desperate Plea -
Celebrities Take Sides As Brooklyn Beckham’s Feud With David, Victoria Heats Up -
Prince Harry Reacts As Beatrice, Eugenie's Names Surface In Epstein Emails -
Cyprus Joins European AI Race: What It Means For Greek LLMs And Regional Innovation -
Amazon Soon To Launch 'AI Content' Marketplace, Says Report