HRCP demands responsible action in land recovery drive
LAHOREThe Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has called upon authorities engaged in an anti-encroachment operation in Sector I-11 of Islamabad to act in a responsible manner and to pay attention to the housing needs of the people being evicted. In a statement, the commission said: “HRCP does not justify
By our correspondents
August 03, 2015
LAHORE
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has called upon authorities engaged in an anti-encroachment operation in Sector I-11 of Islamabad to act in a responsible manner and to pay attention to the housing needs of the people being evicted.
In a statement, the commission said: “HRCP does not justify encroachment and understands the need for action to recover illegally occupied land. However, it must ask authorities engaged in the Sector I-11 action to consider where the people uprooted in the operations will go.”
“Surely, the authorities can understand that the slums being cleared today do not offer the ideal lodging and given a choice most of the people would not have settled there. With respect, the point that the authorities are missing is that eviction from the slums will not make these people disappear. They will simply have to look for a home elsewhere. The manner in which the operation is being carried out also ignores the state’s duty to provide shelter and other amenities to its citizens.”
“We hope the government will simultaneously consider ways to resettle the evicted families, providing them with viable, alternative lodgings. Such an action would not be seen as softening of the stance against encroachment; on the contrary, it would be considered a civilized and considerate action by a government awake to its obligations. HRCP also emphasizes the importance of due process for the dozens of people arrested for offering resistance when their houses were being bulldozed.”
“On another note, if the action in Sector I-11 was considered necessary because of supposed presence of criminal elements in the slums, merely dispersing the ‘criminals’ does not make much sense. Another dimension of this action is the issue of Afghan and non-Afghan slum dwellers. In that respect, what would happen to the uprooted Afghans must be considered. Many would be shifted to refugee camps. Moving them to camps is at best a temporary solution and exposes the serious shortcomings of the repatriation policy that need to be paid attention to.”
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has called upon authorities engaged in an anti-encroachment operation in Sector I-11 of Islamabad to act in a responsible manner and to pay attention to the housing needs of the people being evicted.
In a statement, the commission said: “HRCP does not justify encroachment and understands the need for action to recover illegally occupied land. However, it must ask authorities engaged in the Sector I-11 action to consider where the people uprooted in the operations will go.”
“Surely, the authorities can understand that the slums being cleared today do not offer the ideal lodging and given a choice most of the people would not have settled there. With respect, the point that the authorities are missing is that eviction from the slums will not make these people disappear. They will simply have to look for a home elsewhere. The manner in which the operation is being carried out also ignores the state’s duty to provide shelter and other amenities to its citizens.”
“We hope the government will simultaneously consider ways to resettle the evicted families, providing them with viable, alternative lodgings. Such an action would not be seen as softening of the stance against encroachment; on the contrary, it would be considered a civilized and considerate action by a government awake to its obligations. HRCP also emphasizes the importance of due process for the dozens of people arrested for offering resistance when their houses were being bulldozed.”
“On another note, if the action in Sector I-11 was considered necessary because of supposed presence of criminal elements in the slums, merely dispersing the ‘criminals’ does not make much sense. Another dimension of this action is the issue of Afghan and non-Afghan slum dwellers. In that respect, what would happen to the uprooted Afghans must be considered. Many would be shifted to refugee camps. Moving them to camps is at best a temporary solution and exposes the serious shortcomings of the repatriation policy that need to be paid attention to.”
-
Prince Harry Warns Meghan Markle To 'step Back' -
Selena Gomez Explains Why She Thought Lupus Was 'life-or-death' -
New Zealand Flood Crisis: State Of Emergency Declared As North Island Braces For More Storms -
Nancy Guthrie Case: Mystery Deepens As Unknown DNA Found At Property -
James Van Der Beek's Brother Breaks Silence On Actor's Tragic Death -
Megan Thee Stallion On New Romance With Klay Thompson: 'I'm Comfy' -
Nicole Kidman Celebrates Galentine’s Day Months After Keith Urban Split -
Justin Bieber Unveils Hailey Bieber As First Face Of SKYLRK In Intimate Campaign Debut -
Caitlin O’Connor Says Fiance Joe Manganiello Has Changed Valentine’s Day For Her -
Rachel Zoe Sends Out Message For Womne With Her Post-divorce Diamond Ring -
James Van Der Beek's Final Conversation With Director Roger Avary Laid Bare: 'We Cried' -
Jaden Smith Walks Out Of Interview After Kanye West Question At Film Premiere -
Michelle Obama Gets Candid About Spontaneous Decision At Piercings Tattoo -
Why Halle Berry Wasn't Ready For Marriage After Van Hunt Popped Question? Source -
Bunnie Xo Shares Raw Confession After Year-long IVF Struggle -
Brooks Nader Reveals Why She Quit Fillers After Years