PHC restrains Tesco from collecting surcharges
Fata industrial units
By our correspondents
July 29, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday restrained the Tribal Electric Supply Company (Tesco) from collecting tariff and financial cost surcharges in the monthly electricity bills of the industrial units in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
-
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein