SC rejects Bahria Town’s Rs250b offer

ISLAMABAD: An implementation bench of the Supreme Court Tuesday rejected Bahria Town’s offer to deposit Rs250 billion to avoid legal proceedings for illegally acquiring land for its projects in Karachi, Rawalpindi/Islamabad and Murree.

The bench was hearing a case pertaining to the implementation of a May-4 SC verdict against Bahria Town. Under the order, the court had barred M/s Bahria Town Karachi from selling any plot or constructed apartment in the housing scheme on the outskirts of the port city, declaring the grant of land to the Malir Development Authority and its exchange with the land of the private land developers illegal and void ab initio.

At the outset of today’s hearing, a counsel on behalf of Bahria Town offered to submit Rs200 billion to waive off charges against the real estate developer.

Justice Azmat Saeed, who was heading the three-member bench, reminded the counsel that a fine of Rs285 billion had been imposed on Bahria Town in 2004. “If the fine money is increased by 40 per cent, it will amount to Rs300bn.”

Justice Saeed noted that three separate verdicts had been passed against Bahria Town, so it should make “separate and reasonable” offers for its projects in Karachi, Islamabad and Murree.

At this, Bahira Town’s counsel increased the offer to Rs250bn. “This is not a suitable way to deal with [the apex court],” Justice Saeed said, reprimanding the lawyer. “We may ask the National Accountability Bureau to file a reference.”

The counsel sought one week’s time to file a reply. Justice Saeed granted the plea and directed Bahria Town to submit written offers in all the three cases.

“Our mistake was not that big,” the counsel argued.

“Mistake is supposed to be of one or two kanals, not of thousands of acres,” the judge replied.

The implementation bench was formed after the court had dropped the review petitions filed against its May-4 judgement barring Bahria Town Karachi from selling any plots or constructed apartments.

Meanwhile, the apex court, while hearing housing societies forensic audit case, ordered the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to register a case against officials of Canal View Housing Society and handed over the administrative control of the society to the Cooperative Registrar. The court also ordered new audit of the society.