Memon denies ridiculing judges
KarachiThe provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his
By Jamal Khurshid
April 22, 2015
Karachi
The provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.
In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his speech in the assembly on November 14, 2014 was in good faith and without any “malice or ill-will”.
He submitted that he delivered the speech in the assembly with bona-fide intention as a fair assessment and there was no intention to ridicule, malign or defame the judiciary in any manner whatsoever.
Besides, he submitted parliamentarians enjoyed freedom of speech and were not liable to any proceedings in a court in respect of anything they said in the assembly. He said he had been exercising his powers and functions in accordance with the Constitution and had not violated any of the articles of it.
A SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah after taking the statement on record adjourned the hearing for a date to be notified later. The petitioner, Rana Faizul Hasan, had submitted that the minister had committed contempt of court by passing contemptuous remarks against judges.
The provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.
In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his speech in the assembly on November 14, 2014 was in good faith and without any “malice or ill-will”.
He submitted that he delivered the speech in the assembly with bona-fide intention as a fair assessment and there was no intention to ridicule, malign or defame the judiciary in any manner whatsoever.
Besides, he submitted parliamentarians enjoyed freedom of speech and were not liable to any proceedings in a court in respect of anything they said in the assembly. He said he had been exercising his powers and functions in accordance with the Constitution and had not violated any of the articles of it.
A SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah after taking the statement on record adjourned the hearing for a date to be notified later. The petitioner, Rana Faizul Hasan, had submitted that the minister had committed contempt of court by passing contemptuous remarks against judges.
-
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein