Memon denies ridiculing judges
KarachiThe provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his
By Jamal Khurshid
April 22, 2015
Karachi
The provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.
In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his speech in the assembly on November 14, 2014 was in good faith and without any “malice or ill-will”.
He submitted that he delivered the speech in the assembly with bona-fide intention as a fair assessment and there was no intention to ridicule, malign or defame the judiciary in any manner whatsoever.
Besides, he submitted parliamentarians enjoyed freedom of speech and were not liable to any proceedings in a court in respect of anything they said in the assembly. He said he had been exercising his powers and functions in accordance with the Constitution and had not violated any of the articles of it.
A SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah after taking the statement on record adjourned the hearing for a date to be notified later. The petitioner, Rana Faizul Hasan, had submitted that the minister had committed contempt of court by passing contemptuous remarks against judges.
The provincial information and local government denied on Tuesday that he had violated any article of the Constitution while delivering a speech in the provincial assembly.
In connection with a a petition against him over his alleged contemptuous remarks against judges, Sharjeel Inam Memon said he respected the judiciary and his speech in the assembly on November 14, 2014 was in good faith and without any “malice or ill-will”.
He submitted that he delivered the speech in the assembly with bona-fide intention as a fair assessment and there was no intention to ridicule, malign or defame the judiciary in any manner whatsoever.
Besides, he submitted parliamentarians enjoyed freedom of speech and were not liable to any proceedings in a court in respect of anything they said in the assembly. He said he had been exercising his powers and functions in accordance with the Constitution and had not violated any of the articles of it.
A SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah after taking the statement on record adjourned the hearing for a date to be notified later. The petitioner, Rana Faizul Hasan, had submitted that the minister had committed contempt of court by passing contemptuous remarks against judges.
-
Leonardo DiCaprio's Co-star Reflects On His Viral Moment At Golden Globes -
SpaceX Pivots From Mars Plans To Prioritize 2027 Moon Landing -
J. Cole Brings Back Old-school CD Sales For 'The Fall-Off' Release -
King Charles Still Cares About Meghan Markle -
GTA 6 Built By Hand, Street By Street, Rockstar Confirms Ahead Of Launch -
Funeral Home Owner Sentenced To 40 Years For Selling Corpses, Faking Ashes -
Why Is Thor Portrayed Differently In Marvel Movies? -
Dutch Seismologist Hints At 'surprise’ Quake In Coming Days -
Australia’s Liberal-National Coalition Reunites After Brief Split Over Hate Laws -
DC Director Gives Hopeful Message As Questions Raised Over 'Blue Beetle's Future -
King Charles New Plans For Andrew In Norfolk Exposed -
What You Need To Know About Ischemic Stroke -
Shocking Reason Behind Type 2 Diabetes Revealed By Scientists -
SpaceX Cleared For NASA Crew-12 Launch After Falcon 9 Review -
Meghan Markle Gives Old Hollywood Vibes In New Photos At Glitzy Event -
Simple 'finger Test' Unveils Lung Cancer Diagnosis