close
Thursday March 28, 2024

Court battle over UK baby raises ethical conundrum

By AFP
July 26, 2017

LONDON: A five-month legal battle over the fate of a terminally-ill British baby that drew the attention of Pope Francis and US President Donald Trump has also stoked an often angry debate about medical ethics and the courts.

Charlie Gard´s parents waged a high-profile campaign with the help of social media and Britain´s tabloids for him to receive experimental treatment in the United States, striking a chord worldwide.

They are now spending the last few days with their 11-month-old son before life support is withdrawn at a hospital in London after acknowledging in court on Monday that therapy could no longer help him.

"No-one wanted this outcome. No-one believes this outcome was in Charlie´s best interests," said Julian Savulescu, director of the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford.

"There has got to be a better way." Charlie was born on August 4 last year with a rare form of mitochondrial disease that causes progressive muscle weakness in the heart and other key organs and is only able to survive with life support.

His parents raised money to take their baby to the United States through crowdfunding but were prevented from doing so by the hospital and first went to court in March to try and overturn that decision.

Their appeals went all the way to the Supreme Court but were turned down at all stages of the judicial process and judges at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg refused to intervene.

Charlie was due to be taken off life support before the Vatican intervened on July 2 with a statement in which Pope Francis expressed his support for the parents and said he hoped doctors would allow them to "care for their child until the end".

Trump offered his support the following day, saying in a tweet that he would be "delighted" to help. A Vatican-run hospital in Rome and a US hospital then offered to treat Charlie and London´s Great Ormond Street Hospital went to court to seek a ruling on whether to allow him to undergo experimental therapy.

There have also been small protests by supporters of Charlie´s parents -- a group calling itself "Charlie´s Army" -- outside Buckingham Palace and Downing Street calling for the hospital to listen to the parents.

Savulescu said social media had given greater power to parents to make their case heard. "The question of who should decide is legitimate. Some people have wrongly concluded that these decisions should only be up to parents.