India, US trying to get nuclear deal over line during Obama trip
NEW DELHI: India and the United States were trying to narrow differences on nuclear trade on Thursday ahead of President Barack Obama’s visit, but New Delhi ruled out a change in its liability law that has choked off US investment.Nuclear commerce worth billions of dollars was meant to be
By our correspondents
January 23, 2015
NEW DELHI: India and the United States were trying to narrow differences on nuclear trade on Thursday ahead of President Barack Obama’s visit, but New Delhi ruled out a change in its liability law that has choked off US investment.
Nuclear commerce worth billions of dollars was meant to be the centrepiece of a new strategic relationship between the United States and India, allowing New Delhi access to nuclear technology and fuel without giving up its weapons programme.
But the 2010 Indian nuclear liability law that makes equipment suppliers ultimately responsible for an accident has held back firms including GE-Hitachi, Toshiba’s Westinghouse Electric Company and France’s Areva from proceeding with the construction of reactors. On Thursday, negotiators from the two governments met for a second day in London to hammer out an accord that Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hope to announce during talks set for Sunday. It followed talks in Vienna and New Delhi.
“Even as we speak our negotiators are working together in a collaborative manner in London. It is the third time they are meeting in approximately 45 days, you can see the element of effort that is going into the nuclear issue,” foreign ministry spokesman Syed Akbaruddin told reporters.
India has offered to set up an insurance pool to indemnify companies which have won the right to construct reactors in the country against liability in the case of a nuclear accident, as a way around the law.
It says the law can’t be changed for lack of political support. Under the plan readied by state-run reinsurer GIC Re, insurance would be bought by the companies contracted to build the nuclear reactors who would then recoup the cost by charging more for their services.
Alternatively, state-run operator Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) would take out insurance on behalf of these companies.
“What is being discussed is how, within the four walls of our legal framework, our legislation, we can provide assurances to our partners in the US of any concerns they may have through their vendors or their lawyers,” Akbaruddin said.
Nuclear commerce worth billions of dollars was meant to be the centrepiece of a new strategic relationship between the United States and India, allowing New Delhi access to nuclear technology and fuel without giving up its weapons programme.
But the 2010 Indian nuclear liability law that makes equipment suppliers ultimately responsible for an accident has held back firms including GE-Hitachi, Toshiba’s Westinghouse Electric Company and France’s Areva from proceeding with the construction of reactors. On Thursday, negotiators from the two governments met for a second day in London to hammer out an accord that Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hope to announce during talks set for Sunday. It followed talks in Vienna and New Delhi.
“Even as we speak our negotiators are working together in a collaborative manner in London. It is the third time they are meeting in approximately 45 days, you can see the element of effort that is going into the nuclear issue,” foreign ministry spokesman Syed Akbaruddin told reporters.
India has offered to set up an insurance pool to indemnify companies which have won the right to construct reactors in the country against liability in the case of a nuclear accident, as a way around the law.
It says the law can’t be changed for lack of political support. Under the plan readied by state-run reinsurer GIC Re, insurance would be bought by the companies contracted to build the nuclear reactors who would then recoup the cost by charging more for their services.
Alternatively, state-run operator Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) would take out insurance on behalf of these companies.
“What is being discussed is how, within the four walls of our legal framework, our legislation, we can provide assurances to our partners in the US of any concerns they may have through their vendors or their lawyers,” Akbaruddin said.
-
Pal Reveals Prince William’s ‘disorienting’ Turmoil Over Kate’s Cancer: ‘You Saw In His Eyes & The Way He Held Himself’ -
Poll Reveals Majority Of Americans' Views On Bad Bunny -
Wiz Khalifa Thanks Aimee Aguilar For 'supporting Though Worst' After Dad's Death -
Man Convicted After DNA Links Him To 20-year-old Rape Case -
Royal Expert Shares Update In Kate Middleton's Relationship With Princess Eugenie, Beatrice -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Leaves King Charles With No Choice: ‘Its’ Not Business As Usual’ -
Dua Lipa Wishes Her 'always And Forever' Callum Turner Happy Birthday -
Police Dressed As Money Heist, Captain America Raid Mobile Theft At Carnival -
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones