LHCBA passes resolution against military courts
LAHORETHE Lahore High Court Bar Association on Thursday unanimously passed a resolution against the establishment of military courts in the country and urged parliamentarians to say ‘no’ to a bill likely to be tabled in the parliament to this effect.A general house of the bar unanimously passed the resolution and
By our correspondents
January 02, 2015
LAHORE
THE Lahore High Court Bar Association on Thursday unanimously passed a resolution against the establishment of military courts in the country and urged parliamentarians to say ‘no’ to a bill likely to be tabled in the parliament to this effect.
A general house of the bar unanimously passed the resolution and rejected likely setting up of military courts in the wake of rampant terrorist activities. The house maintained that the Constitution had no room for establishment of military courts in any form. It resolved the strengthening of the prevalent justice system and capacity building of law enforcement and investigation agencies.
Bar’s vice president Amir Jalil Siddiqui conducted the meeting while secretary Mian Ahmad Chachar presented the resolution before the house. Former presidents of Supreme Court Bar Association Hamid Khan and Asma Jahangir, former president of Lahore Bar Association Zulfiqar Chaudhry, Barrister Zafarullah Khan and others addressed on the occasion.
The speakers strongly condemned Peshawar massacre and sought maximum punishment for the terrorists. However, they said that establishing military courts would not be an answer to terrorism as the country had already experienced such courts.
They said the establishment of the military courts was a sheer negation of basic human rights and the lawyers would not tolerate the extra-constitutional move. The speakers maintained that setting up the military courts amounted to defacing the Constitution of Pakistan. They stressed upon the need of overcoming the flaws of the present judicial system within the ambit of the Constitution. The house decided to convene an ‘All Pakistan Lawyers’ Representative Convention’ to debate on the establishment of military courts.
Anarkali fire case: The Lahore High Court Thursday sought reply from the Punjab government, Lahore Development Authority and Lahore DCO on a writ petition seeking implementation of building laws and action against the responsible for Anarkali plaza fire incident.
Justice Shahid Karim issued this order on a petition moved by a local lawyer questioning failure of the government departments concerned to implement the relevant laws to protect lives of innocent citizens. He said innocent citizens lost their lives in the Anarkali fire incident due to criminal negligence, inefficiency, carelessness and failure to implement the relevant laws especially building laws. The petitioner pleaded that a commission should be constituted for fixing the responsibilities and the reasons for such disasters and to lay out the future plan in order to protect the lives of the citizens. He asked the court to seek an explanation from the government authorities to explain their failure to overcome the fire tragedy within the best possible time. He sought penal action against the responsible persons directly or indirectly involved in the tragedy. After hearing initial argument, the court issued notices to the respondents and adjourned hearing for January 22.
THE Lahore High Court Bar Association on Thursday unanimously passed a resolution against the establishment of military courts in the country and urged parliamentarians to say ‘no’ to a bill likely to be tabled in the parliament to this effect.
A general house of the bar unanimously passed the resolution and rejected likely setting up of military courts in the wake of rampant terrorist activities. The house maintained that the Constitution had no room for establishment of military courts in any form. It resolved the strengthening of the prevalent justice system and capacity building of law enforcement and investigation agencies.
Bar’s vice president Amir Jalil Siddiqui conducted the meeting while secretary Mian Ahmad Chachar presented the resolution before the house. Former presidents of Supreme Court Bar Association Hamid Khan and Asma Jahangir, former president of Lahore Bar Association Zulfiqar Chaudhry, Barrister Zafarullah Khan and others addressed on the occasion.
The speakers strongly condemned Peshawar massacre and sought maximum punishment for the terrorists. However, they said that establishing military courts would not be an answer to terrorism as the country had already experienced such courts.
They said the establishment of the military courts was a sheer negation of basic human rights and the lawyers would not tolerate the extra-constitutional move. The speakers maintained that setting up the military courts amounted to defacing the Constitution of Pakistan. They stressed upon the need of overcoming the flaws of the present judicial system within the ambit of the Constitution. The house decided to convene an ‘All Pakistan Lawyers’ Representative Convention’ to debate on the establishment of military courts.
Anarkali fire case: The Lahore High Court Thursday sought reply from the Punjab government, Lahore Development Authority and Lahore DCO on a writ petition seeking implementation of building laws and action against the responsible for Anarkali plaza fire incident.
Justice Shahid Karim issued this order on a petition moved by a local lawyer questioning failure of the government departments concerned to implement the relevant laws to protect lives of innocent citizens. He said innocent citizens lost their lives in the Anarkali fire incident due to criminal negligence, inefficiency, carelessness and failure to implement the relevant laws especially building laws. The petitioner pleaded that a commission should be constituted for fixing the responsibilities and the reasons for such disasters and to lay out the future plan in order to protect the lives of the citizens. He asked the court to seek an explanation from the government authorities to explain their failure to overcome the fire tragedy within the best possible time. He sought penal action against the responsible persons directly or indirectly involved in the tragedy. After hearing initial argument, the court issued notices to the respondents and adjourned hearing for January 22.
-
Jennifer Aniston Already Decided Her Wedding Dress? -
Prince Harry, Meghan’s Hollywood Party Drama Exposes Chaotic PR Strategy -
Jennifer Garner Reacts To Savannah Guthrie's Video As Search For Nancy Guthrie Continues -
Bad Bunny Leaves Fans Worried With Major Move After Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Captain Jason Talks Personal Hardships He Faced Ahead Of 'Below Deck' Season 4 -
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California