Denial of reserved seats: PHC returns PTI petition for being non-maintainable
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has returned a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which challenged the alleged denial of its reserved seats in the assemblies despite having parliamentary representation.
The court cited objections raised by the Additional Registrar (Judicial), stating that the matter had already been decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan and was no longer within the PHC’s jurisdiction.
The objection noted that the PHC’s decision of March 24, 2024, regarding the allocation of reserved seats had been upheld by the Supreme Court in a review petition decided on June 27, 2025.
As a result, the PHC deemed the petition non-maintainable and advised the petitioner to approach the relevant forum instead. The PTI had earlier sought the annulment of decisions related to the distribution of reserved seats, including those made by the Supreme Court, arguing that the party was denied an opportunity to present its stance.
PTI MNA Ali Asghar filed the petition, contending that the party was neither heard nor made a party in the original proceedings. He alleged that the reserved seats were distributed among other political parties without any notice being issued to PTI.
The petitioner claimed that the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had deliberately and fraudulently excluded PTI from the reserved seats allocation process. He asserted that the basis for the court rulings that PTI is not a parliamentary party was incorrect. He urged the court to declare PTI’s claim to the reserved seats legitimate and to issue a notification recognizing him as an MNA representing PTI.
The petition named the successful candidates and the ECP as respondents, stating that seats were allocated to parties that were not entitled to them, while PTI was unjustly sidelined. It challenged the PHC rulings of March 13 and 14, 2024, as well as the Supreme Court verdict of June 27, 2025.
The petitioner maintained that PTI was the most popular political party in the country and had not merged with any other party following the general elections. Respondents in the case included the ECP, Sunni Ittehad Council, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, Pakistan Peoples Party, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl, Jamaat-e-Islami, Awami National Party, and other political entities.
-
Jessica Alba, Cash Warren Finalize Divorce After 16 Years Of Marriage -
China’s AI Boom Takes Center Stage At Spring Festival One Year After DeepSeek Stirred The Industry -
James Van Der Beek Called His Sixth Child Jeremiah 'healing For Us' Before His Death -
Elon Musk Vs Reid Hoffman: Epstein Files Fuel Public Spat Between Tech Billionaires -
Gordon Ramsay Denies Victoria Beckham Got Handsy With Brooklyn At His Wedding -
Gordon Ramsay Makes Unexpected Plea To Brooklyn As He Addresses Beckham Family Feud -
Prince Harry Warns Meghan Markle To 'step Back' -
Selena Gomez Explains Why She Thought Lupus Was 'life-or-death' -
New Zealand Flood Crisis: State Of Emergency Declared As North Island Braces For More Storms -
Nancy Guthrie Case: Mystery Deepens As Unknown DNA Found At Property -
James Van Der Beek's Brother Breaks Silence On Actor's Tragic Death -
Megan Thee Stallion On New Romance With Klay Thompson: 'I'm Comfy' -
Nicole Kidman Celebrates Galentine’s Day Months After Keith Urban Split -
Justin Bieber Unveils Hailey Bieber As First Face Of SKYLRK In Intimate Campaign Debut -
Caitlin O’Connor Says Fiance Joe Manganiello Has Changed Valentine’s Day For Her -
Rachel Zoe Sends Out Message For Womne With Her Post-divorce Diamond Ring