CCP fines fertiliser sector Rs375m for price-fixing
KARACHI: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed fines totalling Rs375 million on six major fertiliser producers and an industry association after finding evidence of collusive pricing that artificially raised urea prices across the country, undermining market competition and harming farmers.
In a ruling announced on Monday, the competition regulator said its investigation concluded that the companies, in coordination with a trade body, engaged in anti-competitive conduct by jointly fixing the retail price of urea. Each firm was fined Rs50 million, while the association was fined Rs75 million.
The case stems from a suo motu inquiry launched by the commission, which found that under the guise of a public awareness campaign, the manufacturers had “effectively fixed the price of urea across the country”. The commission said the move went beyond legal coordination and entered the realm of unlawful collusion in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010.
Despite maintaining that they acted independently, the companies were unable to justify their nearly identical pricing structures. The commission’s findings highlighted that such coordinated conduct distorted the market, curtailed consumer choice, and placed undue financial strain on farmers, particularly during key agricultural seasons.
The firms’ defence, that they were acting in line with government instructions, was dismissed by the CCP. The bench held that no formal state directive existed to compel such coordinated pricing. Instead, a government call for greater price transparency was “misused as a platform to align prices in a manner that eroded competitive discipline”.
Of particular concern was the uniformity of pricing -- Rs1,768 per urea bag -- despite marked differences in production costs, energy inputs and market share across the firms. The commission said this could not be attributed to coincidence or healthy competition, but rather to deliberate, concerted action. Previous warnings issued by the CCP in 2010, 2012 and 2014 had failed to change behaviour.
The CCP’s ruling also criticised the role of trade associations in facilitating price coordination, reiterating that such bodies should not serve as forums for sharing sensitive pricing information. It warned other industries against similar practices, noting that collusion undermines consumer welfare and damages the integrity of markets.
-
Pal Reveals Prince William’s ‘disorienting’ Turmoil Over Kate’s Cancer: ‘You Saw In His Eyes & The Way He Held Himself’ -
Poll Reveals Majority Of Americans' Views On Bad Bunny -
Wiz Khalifa Thanks Aimee Aguilar For 'supporting Though Worst' After Dad's Death -
Man Convicted After DNA Links Him To 20-year-old Rape Case -
Royal Expert Shares Update In Kate Middleton's Relationship With Princess Eugenie, Beatrice -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Leaves King Charles With No Choice: ‘Its’ Not Business As Usual’ -
Dua Lipa Wishes Her 'always And Forever' Callum Turner Happy Birthday -
Police Dressed As Money Heist, Captain America Raid Mobile Theft At Carnival -
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones