Only water option
This letter refers to the articles ‘A nearly dead delta’ (April 18, 2025) by Masood Lohar and ‘Water wounds in the federation’ (April 18, 2025) by Barrister Zamir Ghumro. Pakistan’s water availability has fallen down to 850 cubic metres per person, nearing the ‘absolute water scarcity line’. How did we reach this point without alarm bells ringing? According to some recommendations, Pakistan should have built a major dam every 10 years.
Current water storage is just 25–30 million acre-feet – far below the international standard of 120 days’ capacity. The Soan Dam is the only viable, cost-effective option to boost water storage in Pakistan. Once built, it could store up to 10 times more water than the Tarbela Dam, as per some estimates. This would significantly alleviate Sindh’s water shortages and revive freshwater and silt flow to the Indus Delta.
Syed Hussein El-Edroos
Islamabad
-
Google I/O 2026 Confirmed With Major AI Updates Expected: Check Details Here -
OpenClaw Could Mark The ‘Android Moment’ For Future Of AI Agents: Here’s How -
Ben Affleck’s Migraine Struggle Post Jennifer Lopez Split -
Prince William Keeps Eye On Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Amid Epstein Controversy -
Mia Goth Ends Relationship With Shia LaBeouf After Mardi Gras Incident -
Victoria, David Beckham Take Firm Decision As Brooklyn Uses Feud To Stay In Headlines -
Google AI Search Now Shows Website Sources More Clearly -
Sarah Ferguson Tries To Emotionally Trap Prince William As He Takes A Firm Stand -
Police Detain Man Armed With Loaded Shotgun Running Towards US Capitol Building -
Cardi B Shares Intent To Go Under The Needle Again -
4 Popular Celebrities Who Suffer From Chronic Fatigue -
Lake Tahoe Avalanche: 10 Skiers Missing, 6 Stranded In California -
Meghan Markle Forges Her Own Path While Keeping Clear Of Royal Family Ties To Epstein -
Kristin Cavallari Recalls 'painful' Split From Jay Cutler -
Prince William Closes Ranks As Sarah Ferguson Considers Rebuilding Life In UK -
Jamil Jivani's ‘anti-America’ Comment Prompts Response From Pierre Poilievre