Elders from Mohmand reject proposed mines and minerals bill
PESHAWAR: Tribal elders from the Mohmand district on Wednesday rejected the proposed Mines and Minerals Bill 2025, calling it a deliberate attempt by the federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments to seize natural resources in the tribal regions.
Addressing a press conference at the Peshawar Press Club, the elders, including Malik Israel Safi, Malik Haji Ahmad, Imran Khan, Jahangir, Malik Zaryat Gul and others said the proposed legislation violated the constitutional, economic and geographical rights of the tribal people and posed serious threats to their way of life.
The elders alleged that local communities were being completely sidelined in the management of mineral sites across Mohmand district. “We are neither being offered employment opportunities nor included in profit-sharing or policy-making related to the exploitation of local resources,” said one of the elders.
They also criticised the awarding of mining contracts to external companies, which they claim were not only damaging the environment but also depriving local youth of job opportunities. The elders reminded the government of promises made at the time of the tribal merger that local lands, resources and cultural identity would be protected.
Describing the new laws as a “clear violation” of these promises, they accused the government of drafting the proposed bills in secrecy without any transparency or consultation with tribal stakeholders. They emphasised the urgent need to expose the vested interests behind these policies.
The elders demanded the immediate withdrawal of the Mines and Minerals Bill 2025 and called for mandatory inclusion of tribal communities in all decisions regarding local resources. They urged the government to ensure employment, profit-sharing and protection of lands for local residents and to involve traditional jirga systems and tribal elders before any legislation.Warning of serious consequences, the elders stated that they would launch a protest movement across the tribal districts if their demands are not met. And the federal and provincial governments would be responsible for the consequences, they went on to add.
-
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine -
Ben Affleck Argues In Favour Of His Shirtless Scene In 'The Rip' -
Mississippi Postal Worker Arrested After Complaints Of Marijuana Odour In Letters -
Canada, China Lock Initial Trade Deal On ‘EV,Canola’ To Strengthen Ties: What To Expect Next? -
Melissa Leo On Euphoria Of Winning An Oscar Vs It's Impact On Career -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Express 'hope' In Latest Major Statement -
Sophie Turner Backs Archie Madekwe As BAFTA Announces Nominees -
Jason Momoa Cherishes Hosting Ozzy Osbourne's Final Gig Ahead Of His Death -
Real Reason Timothee Chalamet Thanked Kylie Jenner At Awards Revealed -
Will King Charles Attend Funeral Of Prince Philip's First Cousin, Princess Irene? -
'Furious' Prince William Wants Andrew As Far Away As Possible