Medical and Teaching Institutions: PHC suspends notification on BoG chairmen appointment
PHC two-member bench suspends the notification and issues a notice to the provincial government to submit its reply
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the notification about the appointment of the chairmen of the Board of Governors of the eight Medical and Teaching Institutions (MTIs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali Shah and Justice Wiqar Ahmad suspended the notification and issued a notice to the provincial government to submit its reply.
On June 20, the government appointed the chairmen of the Board of Governors of eight government hospitals in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through a notification.
The court was hearing petitions seeking the removal of the BoG chairmen, who were recently appointed by the provincial government through the notification.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Advocate General Shah Faisal Utmankhel, former secretary Health Mahmood Aslam, secretary Establishment and other relevant officials appeared before the court.
Barrister Babar Shahzad, Sangeen Khan and other lawyers appeared for the petitioners.
It may be mentioned that the government appointed the chairpersons of the Board of Governors of the eight medical teaching institutions despite the issuance of the contempt notices.
The PHC had issued contempt notices to the government for making the appointments. Dr Umar Ayub, the BoG chairman of the Khyber Teaching Hospital, had challenged his removal and had got a stay order from the court. Besides Umar Ayub, other members of the board had also challenged their removal.
The lawyer for Dr Umar Ayub told the bench that his client was appointed as the chairman BoG of Khyber Teaching Hospital in 2023 and he had informed the court at the last hearing that the government was mulling replacing him. However, the KP advocate general had told the court on June 13 that the petition of Dr Umar Ayub was premature. Justice Arshad Ali asked the advocate general that being a responsible official he had informed the court that no such thing was going to happen, but the petitioner was removed. Shah Faisal Utmankhel told the bench that he did not know about the details of the case and had come to the court in connection with another petition.
The lawyers for other petitioners told the court that the government appointed the BoGs in violation of the court orders, which amounted to contempt of court. Clubbing all the petitions together, the court suspended the notification and issued notices to the respondents.
-
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress -
Rosie O’Donnell Secretly Returned To US To Test Safety -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Spotted On Date Night On Valentine’s Day -
King Charles Butler Spills Valentine’s Day Dinner Blunders -
Brooklyn Beckham Hits Back At Gordon Ramsay With Subtle Move Over Remark On His Personal Life -
Meghan Markle Showcases Princess Lilibet Face On Valentine’s Day -
Harry Styles Opens Up About Isolation After One Direction Split -
Shamed Andrew Was ‘face To Face’ With Epstein Files, Mocked For Lying -
Kanye West Projected To Explode Music Charts With 'Bully' After He Apologized Over Antisemitism -
Leighton Meester Reflects On How Valentine’s Day Feels Like Now -
Sarah Ferguson ‘won’t Let Go Without A Fight’ After Royal Exile -
Adam Sandler Makes Brutal Confession: 'I Do Not Love Comedy First' -
'Harry Potter' Star Rupert Grint Shares Where He Stands Politically -
Drama Outside Nancy Guthrie's Home Unfolds Described As 'circus' -
Marco Rubio Sends Message Of Unity To Europe