Australia to hold referendum on Indigenous ‘Voice’ in 2023
SYDNEY: Australians will decide next year if the country´s constitution will be changed to give an institutional voice to the long-suffering Indigenous population, the government said on Wednesday.
The proposed “Voice to Parliament” aims to give Indigenous Australians a greater say in national policy-making, as they battle poorer health, lower incomes and higher barriers to education.
Indigenous Australians are not currently mentioned in the country´s constitution -- adopted in 1901 -- and any move to change that is politically contentious.
Australia´s centre-left government was elected in May and had promised to hold a referendum on the issue -- but until now has shied away from setting a date.
Speaking at a folk festival in the state of Queensland later on Wednesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will say the vote will be held “next year”, according to prepared remarks released by his government.
“I also want to reaffirm, proudly and clearly, my government´s determination to enshrine in the Australian constitution an Indigenous Voice to Parliament,” he will say.
The Voice to Parliament would establish a constitutionally-recognised body -- or voice -- responsible for advising the government on issues impacting Indigenous Australians.
Albanese argues the constitutional change would help Australia “come together as a nation and take the hand that First Nations people have extended to us”.
Advocacy group Reconciliation Australia said putting it in the constitution would mean it cannot be “shut down” if a different government had a change of heart in the future.
“Embedding a Voice in the constitution would recognise the special place of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia´s history,” the group has said.
Of Australia´s 25 million residents, about 900,000 identify as Indigenous.
The conservative Nationals party, a minor political player, has already announced it will campaign against the Voice.
The centre-right Liberal party, Australia´s main opposition, has yet to take a position.
Critics have called the Voice “another layer of bureaucratic red tape” and have questioned whether it will make any difference in remote Indigenous communities.
-
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress -
Rosie O’Donnell Secretly Returned To US To Test Safety -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Spotted On Date Night On Valentine’s Day -
King Charles Butler Spills Valentine’s Day Dinner Blunders -
Brooklyn Beckham Hits Back At Gordon Ramsay With Subtle Move Over Remark On His Personal Life -
Meghan Markle Showcases Princess Lilibet Face On Valentine’s Day -
Harry Styles Opens Up About Isolation After One Direction Split -
Shamed Andrew Was ‘face To Face’ With Epstein Files, Mocked For Lying -
Kanye West Projected To Explode Music Charts With 'Bully' After He Apologized Over Antisemitism -
Leighton Meester Reflects On How Valentine’s Day Feels Like Now -
Sarah Ferguson ‘won’t Let Go Without A Fight’ After Royal Exile -
Adam Sandler Makes Brutal Confession: 'I Do Not Love Comedy First' -
'Harry Potter' Star Rupert Grint Shares Where He Stands Politically -
Drama Outside Nancy Guthrie's Home Unfolds Described As 'circus' -
Marco Rubio Sends Message Of Unity To Europe