Imran moves IHC against disqualification in Toshakhana reference
Imran Khan challenged the order of the ECP in the Islamabad High Court, praying to the court to set aside the judgment as ECP had no jurisdiction over the matter.
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan Saturday challenged the order of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in the Islamabad High Court, praying to the court to set aside the judgment as ECP had no jurisdiction over the matter.
On Friday, the ECP disqualified the former premier in the Toshakhana reference, stating he had committed corrupt practices by making “false statements and submitting incorrect declaration”.
“We are of the considered opinion that the respondent (Imran Khan) has become disqualified under Article 63(1)(p) of the Constitution, read with Sections 137, 167, and 173 of the Elections Act, 2017, consequently he ceases to be a Member of the National Assembly of Pakistan and his seat has become vacant accordingly,” read the ECP order.
PTI’s counsel Barrister Ali Zafar filed the appeal and pleaded the court to hear the case same day.
The PTI chairman in his application has made the ECP’s secretary, NA’s Speaker and secretary as respondents.
However, the office of the IHC registrar raised several objections to the application.
The objections included that PTI chief Imran Khan has not undergone biometric verification and the copy of ECP’s verdict disqualifying him (Imran) has not been attached with the application.
Later, the IHC, rejecting the PTI counsel’s request for the fixing the hearing on the same day, postponed the hearing till Monday (tomorrow).
In his plea, the PTI chairman has asked the court to declare, find and hold that the ECP order is against the settled principles of law on Article 63 of the Constitution, misconceived and set it aside.
He also requested the IHC to rule that the ECP could not have exercised the jurisdiction to decide any questions of ‘corrupt practice or disqualification’ under §137 read with §232 of the Election Act and further read with Rule 137 of Election Rules 2017.
The former prime minister further asked the court to declare that the reference itself is incompetent, illegal, unlawful and without lawful authority, mala-fide, and devoid of force and in the circumstance of the instant case declare it null and void in the interest of justice. Imran Khan also requested to suspend the operation of the order and restrain further proceedings till the final disposal of the petition.
-
Polar Vortex ‘exceptional’ Disruption: Rare Shift Signals Extreme February Winter -
Which Countries Are Worst And Best In Public Sector AI Race? -
Matthew McConaughey Opens Up About His Painful Battle With THIS -
Emma Stone Reveals She Is ‘too Afraid’ Of Her ‘own Mental Health’ -
China Unveils ‘Star Wars’-like Missile Warship For Space Combat -
King Charles Facing Pressure Inside Palace Over 'Andrew Problem' -
Trump Refuses Apology For Video Depicting Obama As Apes Amid Growing Backlash -
Jesy Nelson Reflects On Leaving Girls' Band Little Mix -
World’s First Pokemon Theme Park Opens In Tokyo, Boosts Japan Tourism -
Waymo Trains Robotaxis In Virtual Cities Using DeepMind’s Genie 3 -
5 Simple Rules To Follow For Smooth, Healthy Hair -
$44 Billion Bitcoin Blunder: Bithumb Exchange Apologizes For Accidental Payout -
Katie Price Ends Public Feud With Ex Peter Andre After 16 Years -
Apple May Bring ChatGPT And Other AI Apps To CarPlay -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Likely To Attend Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 -
AI Next Big Trial: Elon Musk Calls For ‘Galileo Test’ To Prove True Intelligence