Afghan govt, rights groups accuse Taliban of abuses in Kunduz battle
KABUL: The Afghan government on Sunday accused the Taliban of carrying out human rights abuses during two weeks of fighting for the control of the northern city of Kunduz this month, even though insurgents say they sought to protect civilians.Though the Taliban only controlled the city for three days, fighting
By our correspondents
October 19, 2015
KABUL: The Afghan government on Sunday accused the Taliban of carrying out human rights abuses during two weeks of fighting for the control of the northern city of Kunduz this month, even though insurgents say they sought to protect civilians.
Though the Taliban only controlled the city for three days, fighting between the militants and Afghan security forces continued for two weeks, driving tens of thousands of residents to seek safety in neighbouring provinces.
At least 50 civilians were killed and more than 350 wounded, according to hospital records compiled by the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), though it says the death toll is likely to be much higher. Some 100,000 residents fled the clashes, according to UN estimates.
“Our people recounted examples of the atrocities committed by (the Taliban),” said Afghanistan’s Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah at a press conference in Kabul on Sunday. “It shows no change in the behaviour and politics of this criminal group.”
The AIHRC is calling for the government to investigate what it called “widespread and grave human rights violations” by militants during the battle for Kunduz.Civilians were dragged out of their homes and killed in the street, used as human shields, and taken hostage by the insurgents, said a report released by the commission on Thursday.
The report also said evidence suggested women had been assaulted by anti-government armed fighters during the offensive, echoing earlier reports by rights group Amnesty International that female health workers and prisoners had been raped during the siege.
A Taliban spokesman rejected the commission’s allegations. “Eliminating enemy personnel and structures is part of war, however utmost care was taken in dealing with civilians and unwarranted trouble given to no one,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement on Friday.
In addition, at least 22 patients and staff were killed in a US air strike of a hospital run by Medecins Sans Frontieres on October 3.The Taliban fighters said they went into Kunduz under orders from their leader Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour to win “hearts and minds”.
But many Kunduz residents, who fled the fighting, offered a very different version of events.At a hotel in Kabul last week, where dozens of women and their children were staying after escaping Kunduz city without their husbands, several women said they had heard rumours that armed fighters were assaulting women in the city.
“This was one of the main reasons I wanted to get my daughters out,” said Nadra Nahrinwal, who fled to Kabul in a car with her five daughters and son. “The north is gone,” she said. “It will never be safe again.”
Though the Taliban only controlled the city for three days, fighting between the militants and Afghan security forces continued for two weeks, driving tens of thousands of residents to seek safety in neighbouring provinces.
At least 50 civilians were killed and more than 350 wounded, according to hospital records compiled by the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), though it says the death toll is likely to be much higher. Some 100,000 residents fled the clashes, according to UN estimates.
“Our people recounted examples of the atrocities committed by (the Taliban),” said Afghanistan’s Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah at a press conference in Kabul on Sunday. “It shows no change in the behaviour and politics of this criminal group.”
The AIHRC is calling for the government to investigate what it called “widespread and grave human rights violations” by militants during the battle for Kunduz.Civilians were dragged out of their homes and killed in the street, used as human shields, and taken hostage by the insurgents, said a report released by the commission on Thursday.
The report also said evidence suggested women had been assaulted by anti-government armed fighters during the offensive, echoing earlier reports by rights group Amnesty International that female health workers and prisoners had been raped during the siege.
A Taliban spokesman rejected the commission’s allegations. “Eliminating enemy personnel and structures is part of war, however utmost care was taken in dealing with civilians and unwarranted trouble given to no one,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement on Friday.
In addition, at least 22 patients and staff were killed in a US air strike of a hospital run by Medecins Sans Frontieres on October 3.The Taliban fighters said they went into Kunduz under orders from their leader Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour to win “hearts and minds”.
But many Kunduz residents, who fled the fighting, offered a very different version of events.At a hotel in Kabul last week, where dozens of women and their children were staying after escaping Kunduz city without their husbands, several women said they had heard rumours that armed fighters were assaulting women in the city.
“This was one of the main reasons I wanted to get my daughters out,” said Nadra Nahrinwal, who fled to Kabul in a car with her five daughters and son. “The north is gone,” she said. “It will never be safe again.”
-
King Charles Takes A Major Step To Keep Horrified Prince William Out Of The Loop On Andrew: Insider -
Taylor Swift Set To Make Biggest Cut From Her Wedding Guest: Blake Lively Or Ryan Reynolds -
Prince William Meets Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman -
Brooklyn Beckham Brutally Cuts Off Inner Circle Amid Feud With David, Victoria -
Kaley Cuoco Reveals Why Fiance Tom Pelphrey Sleeps In Seperate Room -
Ghislaine Maxwell Will Not Answer Congress Questions On Epstein -
Kensington Palace Announces Prince William's Arrival In Saudi Arabia -
‘Andrew Crisis Follows King Charles Everywhere Now’ -
Jennifer Aniston Already Decided Her Wedding Dress? -
Prince Harry, Meghan’s Hollywood Party Drama Exposes Chaotic PR Strategy -
Jennifer Garner Reacts To Savannah Guthrie's Video As Search For Nancy Guthrie Continues -
Bad Bunny Leaves Fans Worried With Major Move After Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Captain Jason Talks Personal Hardships He Faced Ahead Of 'Below Deck' Season 4 -
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV?