Govt reply sought in Copyright Act cases
LAHORE The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought reply from the federal government on a number of petitions seeking quashment of FIRs registered under Copyright Act by Federal Investigation Agency.Justice Mamoon Rashid Sheikh of the LHC heard the case. The petitioners pleaded that Federal Investigation Agency was carrying out its
By our correspondents
September 17, 2015
LAHORE
The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought reply from the federal government on a number of petitions seeking quashment of FIRs registered under Copyright Act by Federal Investigation Agency.Justice Mamoon Rashid Sheikh of the LHC heard the case.
The petitioners pleaded that Federal Investigation Agency was carrying out its proceedings under Copyright Act. They contended that the board had also not been constituted and in such case, how the FIA could carry on its proceedings.
On it, the court expressed surprise and observed that how FIA could carry on its proceedings under Copyright Act if the relevant board had not been constituted. The judge sought reply from the federal government and adjourned further hearing until October 6.
dismissed: A division bench of the Lahore High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition challenging trial of the accused of Model Town incident of first FIR ruling that the petition was not-maintainable.
Bench led by Justice Abdul Sami Khan held the proceedings on a petition filed by former SHO of Faisal Town police Amir Saleem. The petitioner told the bench that Joint Investigation Team had declared the accused persons of second FIR innocent including the chief minister.
He contended that if two FIRs are registered in a matter then the first FIR becomes ineffective and proceedings are held on the second FIR. He said he was nominated in the first FIR of Model Town incident but the trial of the first FIR’s accused was being carried out even after the second FIR which was unlawful. Assistant Advocate General Punjab Sahil Sattar opposed his arguments and said that the police had submitted challan of the first FIR in the Anti-Terrorism Court. If the accused considered himself innocent he should have filed acquittal application in the trial court. He said the petition of the accused petitioner be dismissed.
After hearing both sides, the bench reserved the verdict and later announced that the petition was not maintainable.
The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought reply from the federal government on a number of petitions seeking quashment of FIRs registered under Copyright Act by Federal Investigation Agency.Justice Mamoon Rashid Sheikh of the LHC heard the case.
The petitioners pleaded that Federal Investigation Agency was carrying out its proceedings under Copyright Act. They contended that the board had also not been constituted and in such case, how the FIA could carry on its proceedings.
On it, the court expressed surprise and observed that how FIA could carry on its proceedings under Copyright Act if the relevant board had not been constituted. The judge sought reply from the federal government and adjourned further hearing until October 6.
dismissed: A division bench of the Lahore High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition challenging trial of the accused of Model Town incident of first FIR ruling that the petition was not-maintainable.
Bench led by Justice Abdul Sami Khan held the proceedings on a petition filed by former SHO of Faisal Town police Amir Saleem. The petitioner told the bench that Joint Investigation Team had declared the accused persons of second FIR innocent including the chief minister.
He contended that if two FIRs are registered in a matter then the first FIR becomes ineffective and proceedings are held on the second FIR. He said he was nominated in the first FIR of Model Town incident but the trial of the first FIR’s accused was being carried out even after the second FIR which was unlawful. Assistant Advocate General Punjab Sahil Sattar opposed his arguments and said that the police had submitted challan of the first FIR in the Anti-Terrorism Court. If the accused considered himself innocent he should have filed acquittal application in the trial court. He said the petition of the accused petitioner be dismissed.
After hearing both sides, the bench reserved the verdict and later announced that the petition was not maintainable.
-
AI Film School Trains Hollywood’s Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones -
Teyana Taylor Reflects On Her Friendship With Julia Roberts -
Bright Green Comet C/2024 E1 Nears Closest Approach Before Leaving Solar System -
Meghan Markle Warns Prince Harry As Royal Family Lands In 'biggest Crises' Since Death Of Princess Diana -
Elon Musk Weighs Parenthood Against AI Boom, Sparking Public Debate -
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles' -
AI-powered Police Robots To Fight Crime By 2028: Report -
Everything We Know About Jessie J's Breast Cancer Journey -
Winter Olympics 2026: What To Watch In Men’s Hockey Today -
Winnie Harlow Breaks Vitiligo Stereotypes: 'I'm Not A Sufferer'