Big crowds make up for pink ball’s dominance
By our correspondents
November 30, 2015
ADELAIDE: Cricket’s inaugural day-night Test between Australia and New Zealand finished within three days but bumper crowds helped to compensate for the pink ball’s dominance of the bat.
Australia went down as victors of the first floodlit Test after sealing a nerve-jangling, three-wicket victory late on Sunday but organisers will also claim a win, with 120,000 fans flocking to Adelaide Oval through the match.
“The whole Test match was a great innovation, it was a great spectacle and to get 120,000 people through the gate in three days is absolutely amazing,” Australia captain Steven Smith told reporters.
After batsmen dominated the earlier Tests in Brisbane and Perth, the highest innings total in Adelaide was 228 and only 821 runs were scored at a venue traditionally regarded a batsman’s paradise.
Fears for the pink ball’s endurance undoubtedly played a part and the curator prepared a wicket cushioned with grass to ensure it would not degrade too quickly.
In the end no team came near to taking a new ball after 80 overs, with the longest innings lasting 72.5 overs.
Many of the batsmen succumbed to poor shots and Australia wicketkeeper Peter Nevill’s first innings 66 was the highest score.
The vagaries of the ball undoubtedly played a big part, however, and it swung more during the evening sessions when it was also tougher for the batsmen to see under the floodlights.
While Smith shrugged off the bowlers’ dominance as just “one of those games”, opposing captain Brendon McCullum felt there was room for fine-tuning.
Overall, he thought the match was an emphatic success.
“As pink-ball cricket evolves, which I’m sure it will in the global game, I think we’ll see that pitches won’t have quite as much grass on them,” he said.
“Day-night cricket is meant to allow Test cricket to be played at night time, it’s not meant to differ. It’s not meant to change how Test cricket is played.
“Under lights, the ball probably responded a bit too much, but I would say that as a batter.
“Overall, it’s a roaring success — 120,000 people turning up over three days. People are voting with their feet. I think it’s here to stay, which is great.”
Australia went down as victors of the first floodlit Test after sealing a nerve-jangling, three-wicket victory late on Sunday but organisers will also claim a win, with 120,000 fans flocking to Adelaide Oval through the match.
“The whole Test match was a great innovation, it was a great spectacle and to get 120,000 people through the gate in three days is absolutely amazing,” Australia captain Steven Smith told reporters.
After batsmen dominated the earlier Tests in Brisbane and Perth, the highest innings total in Adelaide was 228 and only 821 runs were scored at a venue traditionally regarded a batsman’s paradise.
Fears for the pink ball’s endurance undoubtedly played a part and the curator prepared a wicket cushioned with grass to ensure it would not degrade too quickly.
In the end no team came near to taking a new ball after 80 overs, with the longest innings lasting 72.5 overs.
Many of the batsmen succumbed to poor shots and Australia wicketkeeper Peter Nevill’s first innings 66 was the highest score.
The vagaries of the ball undoubtedly played a big part, however, and it swung more during the evening sessions when it was also tougher for the batsmen to see under the floodlights.
While Smith shrugged off the bowlers’ dominance as just “one of those games”, opposing captain Brendon McCullum felt there was room for fine-tuning.
Overall, he thought the match was an emphatic success.
“As pink-ball cricket evolves, which I’m sure it will in the global game, I think we’ll see that pitches won’t have quite as much grass on them,” he said.
“Day-night cricket is meant to allow Test cricket to be played at night time, it’s not meant to differ. It’s not meant to change how Test cricket is played.
“Under lights, the ball probably responded a bit too much, but I would say that as a batter.
“Overall, it’s a roaring success — 120,000 people turning up over three days. People are voting with their feet. I think it’s here to stay, which is great.”
-
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein