This letter refers to the editorial ‘Complicated case’ (Jan 15, 2020). The editorial raises many questions on the judgment passed by the Lahore High Court setting aside the conviction of former president Pervez Musharraf for declaring a state of emergency on November 3, 2007. A state of emergency is imposed under extreme conditions when the state machinery stands in ruins, as was happening at that time. Hearings in the case against Musharraf began in 2013 and a verdict could have been rendered before he left Pakistan for medical treatment abroad in 2016. It is true that he was summoned many a times but how could a sick person come and present himself.
We have allowed an already convicted person to leave the country for treatment abroad and therefore cannot stop any sick person from leaving the country on the premise that he is facing cases. No one can be condemned without first being heard, the law is very clear that if there is even an iota of doubt the benefit goes to the accused.
Lt Col (r) Mukhtar Ahmed Butt
Karachi
The NFC Award, a step towards provincial financial autonomy, was established under Article 160 of the constitution. It...
As our country grapples with the consequences of environmental degradation, it is imperative that we take decisive...
All political parties must strictly work within the confines of the 1973 constitution, if they desire other...
We must stop new fossil fuel projects and declare a climate emergency to end the era of fossil fuels and invest in...
This letter refers to the news report ‘Shehbaz to personally monitor Saudi investment’ . It was reported that PM...
Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar’s notification as deputy PM is being hotly debated in the media. Some are arguing that,...