Pervez Musharraf denied justice, say supporters
LONDON: Former president General (R) Pervez Musharraf’s supporters allege that he has been treated unfairly and that he doesn’t deserve death sentence after being tried under Article 6 of the Constitution for high treason.
Activists of All Pakistan Muslim League (APML) gathered outside the Pakistan High Commission to “demand justice for Pervez Musharraf” and to register condemnation of the “politically motivated” cases against their leader.
Afzal Siddiqui, President APML Overseas, Saeed Bhatti, President APML UK; Asif Shahzad, Adam Gheeasuddin, General Secretary APML UK, Fehmeeda Abbasi, President Women Wing APML UK, Altaf Shahid and others led the protest.
Raising slogans in support of Musharraf, they said the ex-president had brought a lot of development to Pakistan and under him the country earned respect in the world. They claimed that Musharraf’s years in power were the “golden era” of Pakistan and he dealt with terrorism effectively. The protestors said the verdict delivered by the Islamabad Special Court against Musharraf was unfair.
Afzal Siddiqui said the APML condemned the paragraph 66 of the Special Court verdict. He claimed that Musharraf was not given the right to a fair trial and the way this trial was initiated and conducted showed that it had always been an exercise of “revenge”.
He criticised former chief justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry for instructing the government to invoke Article 6 against Musharraf. He said it became clear when a Supreme Court judge openly mocked the former president.
Siddiqui said, “The political, fabricated and fraudulent nature of the case may also be gauged from the fact that it was hastily concluded without hearing the former president, sentencing him in absentia, restricting the latter from presenting evidence and by aggressively dismissing the noble efforts of the law minister and the attorney general for remedying earlier serious politicised legal shortcomings. The new prosecution team was not even granted the time to study the case.”
A petition presented to diplomats at the Pakistan High Commission said holding the Constitution in abeyance was not an offence according to the Pakistani constitution in 2007. Only later in 2010 through the 18th Amendment, the text of Article 6 was modified to make abeyance of the constitution an offense, it said.
The petition thanked Imran Khan’s government “for parting ways with the previous regime and for taking steps to ensure fairness”.
It added: “We ask to declare null and void this bizarre Special Court judgment and reject all malicious attempts to label Pervez Musharraf a ‘traitor’. The honourable Pervez Musharraf has fought wars for Pakistan and was the beloved Chief of Pakistan Army. His tenure witnessed unprecedented growth of the Pakistani economy and led to the betterment of the Pakistani people. Pervez Musharraf can never be a traitor.”
-
World's Biggest Fish Market Is Set To Open In Sydney: First Look Revealed -
Ariana Grande, Jonathan Bailey Reuniting For THIS Project -
Sydney Sweeney Saved Herself From Brutal Roast: Here's How -
Prince Harry’s ‘unrealistic’ Hopes Get Dashed: ‘Sincerity For King Charles Is Under Question’ -
Meghan Markle's New Product Sells Out Within Minutes -
Revealed: Who Leonardo DiCaprio Was Talking To In Viral Golden Globe Video -
Prince William Represents King Charles At Windsor Castle Ceremony -
'Hotel Transylvania 5' Gets Major Update By Film's Star -
PlayStation Plus Adds Over 300 Hours Of Gameplay Across Massive New Titles -
Mandy Moore On Mom Friendships Amid Ashley Tisdale's Mom Group Claims -
Justin Baldoni Objects To Removing Taylor Swift's Name From Case -
Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Warned About Royal Titles After They Turn Down Prince William's Request -
Samsung One UI 8.5 Adds Fully Customisable Unlock Animations -
Injured By Bullets, New York Father-son Duo Beat Alleged Gunman With A Bat -
Annular Solar Eclipse 2026: Here's Everything To Know About The ‘ring Of Fire’ -
Blake Lively Gives Up Hopes Of Taylor Swift Reconciliation?