Psychologists should no longer aid military, group says

WASHINGTON: A representative of the US’s largest professional association of psychologists, which is in the throes of crisis after an independent review found it to be complicit in torture, has said psychologists should no longer participate in US detentions and interrogations.
The US’s top psychology association colluded with the Pentagon and the CIA to devise ethical guidelines to support post-9/11 interrogation techniques that have since been labeled as torture, a report said on Saturday.
Some members of the American Psychological Association (APA), including senior staff, sought to “curry favor” with defence officials, according to the 542-page probe commissioned by APA’s board.
These individuals issued an ethics policy that aligned with government interrogation techniques after the September 11 2001 terror attacks, such as waterboarding and sleep deprivation.
The association colluded with several government agencies, including the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to devise ethical guidelines for the interrogation programme under former president George W Bush, according to the review.
The government agencies “purportedly wanted permissive ethical guidelines so that their psychologists could continue to participate in harsh and abusive interrogation techniques being used by these agencies after the September 11 attacks,” the report said.
“APA’s principal motive in doing so was to align APA and curry favor with DoD (Department of Defence). There were two other important motives: to create a good public-relations response, and to keep the growth of psychology unrestrained in this area.”
The findings come after Democrats on the US Senate Intelligence Committee in December released a damning report detailing brutal and previously unknown interrogation techniques, including beatings and rectal rehydration, used by the CIA on al-Qaeda suspects post 9/11.
According to report, APA’s ethics director Stephen Behnke worked with a military psychologist to draft the organisation’s public policy statements and also received a Pentagon contract to train interrogators.
The report said he did not tell the APA board about his involvement in training defence department staff.
Responding to the findings, the APA — the largest professional psychology organisation in the country — said late on Friday it would review its policies and urge a ban on its psychologists from participating directly in interrogations.
“The organisation’s intent was not to enable abusive interrogation techniques or contribute to violations of human rights, but that may have been the result,” said Nadine Kaslow, who led an independent review committee that commissioned the report.
“We profoundly regret, and apologize for, the behavior and the consequences that ensued.”
The independent review was led by attorney David Hoffman of Sidley Austin law firm.
It was commissioned by APA’s board of directors and took seven months to complete.
The report said that in 2005, the APA created a task force to review the association’s ethical guidelines that determined when its psychologists could participate in interrogations.
A subsequent report from the task force found there were no ethical violations of psychologists’ participation in the government’s “enhanced interrogation” program — which included techniques such as waterboarding, forced “stress positions” and sleep deprivation.
Behnke reportedly “collaborated behind the scenes about the eventual content of the task force’s report,” the review said.
Critics cited in the report said the APA’s decisions “were intentionally made to help the government commit torture.”
The report found that the ethical guidelines “prioritized the protection of psychologists — even those who might have engaged in unethical behavior — above the protection of the public.”
The review also found that two former APA presidents sat on CIA advisory committees, and one of them told the intelligence agency he did not think that sleep deprivation constituted torture.