SHC directs SEPA to consider request for additional comments
KarachiThe Sindh High Court directed the provincial environment protection agency on Friday to consider the request of the public, if made, for holding public hearings to receive additional comments over the environmental impact assessment of the two nuclear power plants planned to be set up in Karachi.The directives came on
By Jamal Khurshid
April 25, 2015
Karachi
The Sindh High Court directed the provincial environment protection agency on Friday to consider the request of the public, if made, for holding public hearings to receive additional comments over the environmental impact assessment of the two nuclear power plants planned to be set up in Karachi.
The directives came on an application filed by Sharmeen Obaid Chiony and others against the Sindh Environmental Protection Agency director general for violating court orders in respect of conducting the EIA for the project.
The applicants submitted that the SHC had ordered the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission on December 22 to file a fresh environment impact assessment for the approval of the two nuclear power plants in Karachi before the provincial environment protection agency in accordance with provision of Section 17 of the Sindh Environment Protection Act. They submitted that the court had observed that provisions of SEPA Act and Regulations 2014 particularly Section 17 (3) (2) of the Act were strictly to be adhered to.
However, they submitted that SEPA had failed to publish notices for conducting the EIA in leading newspapers as required under the rules and sufficient time was provided to the objectors to file comments.
The applicants’ counsel, Abdul Sattar Pirzada, submitted that he would not press the application if the respondents were directed to give additional time to the applicants for filing comments.
An SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah observed that such directives could not be passed without issuing notices to the respondents. The counsel submitted that as the public hearing was fixed for April 27, the application should be disposed of with directives to the respondents to consider the request, if any, made by the applicants in terms of section 31(2) of SEPA Act.
The court disposing of the application directed SEPA to consider the request of thje applicant or any objector in term of section 31(2) of the SEPA Act strictly as per law.
It is pertinent to mention that petitioners had raised several questions with regard to environment impact of the two nuclear power projects being constructed in Karachi.
However, the PAEC argued that work on the two nuclear power projects sites had been started after fulfilling all technical, scientific, legal, international and environmental pre-requisites.
The Sindh High Court directed the provincial environment protection agency on Friday to consider the request of the public, if made, for holding public hearings to receive additional comments over the environmental impact assessment of the two nuclear power plants planned to be set up in Karachi.
The directives came on an application filed by Sharmeen Obaid Chiony and others against the Sindh Environmental Protection Agency director general for violating court orders in respect of conducting the EIA for the project.
The applicants submitted that the SHC had ordered the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission on December 22 to file a fresh environment impact assessment for the approval of the two nuclear power plants in Karachi before the provincial environment protection agency in accordance with provision of Section 17 of the Sindh Environment Protection Act. They submitted that the court had observed that provisions of SEPA Act and Regulations 2014 particularly Section 17 (3) (2) of the Act were strictly to be adhered to.
However, they submitted that SEPA had failed to publish notices for conducting the EIA in leading newspapers as required under the rules and sufficient time was provided to the objectors to file comments.
The applicants’ counsel, Abdul Sattar Pirzada, submitted that he would not press the application if the respondents were directed to give additional time to the applicants for filing comments.
An SHC division bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah observed that such directives could not be passed without issuing notices to the respondents. The counsel submitted that as the public hearing was fixed for April 27, the application should be disposed of with directives to the respondents to consider the request, if any, made by the applicants in terms of section 31(2) of SEPA Act.
The court disposing of the application directed SEPA to consider the request of thje applicant or any objector in term of section 31(2) of the SEPA Act strictly as per law.
It is pertinent to mention that petitioners had raised several questions with regard to environment impact of the two nuclear power projects being constructed in Karachi.
However, the PAEC argued that work on the two nuclear power projects sites had been started after fulfilling all technical, scientific, legal, international and environmental pre-requisites.
-
Lana Del Rey Announces New Single Co-written With Husband Jeremy Dufrene -
Ukraine-Russia Talks Heat Up As Zelenskyy Warns Of US Pressure Before Elections -
Lil Nas X Spotted Buying Used Refrigerator After Backlash Over Nude Public Meltdown -
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters -
Candace Cameron Bure Says She’s Supporting Lori Loughlin After Separation From Mossimo Giannulli -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are ‘not Innocent’ In Epstein Drama -
Reese Witherspoon Goes 'boss' Mode On 'Legally Blonde' Prequel -
Chris Hemsworth And Elsa Pataky Open Up About Raising Their Three Children In Australia -
Record Set Straight On King Charles’ Reason For Financially Supporting Andrew And Not Harry -
Michael Douglas Breaks Silence On Jack Nicholson's Constant Teasing -
How Prince Edward Was ‘bullied’ By Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor -
'Kryptonite' Singer Brad Arnold Loses Battle With Cancer -
Gabourey Sidibe Gets Candid About Balancing Motherhood And Career