Govt urged to seek low-cost energy solution
LAHORE: Electricity produced from LNG would add to problems of the power sector as cost of such electricity would be higher than that from furnace oil. This was stated in a factsheet issued Monday by the Institute for Policy Reforms (IPR). IPR has advised the government to learn lessons from
By our correspondents
April 15, 2015
LAHORE: Electricity produced from LNG would add to problems of the power sector as cost of such electricity would be higher than that from furnace oil.
This was stated in a factsheet issued Monday by the Institute for Policy Reforms (IPR). IPR has advised the government to learn lessons from the past mistakes. So far, little is known about the import price of LNG. However, based on the estimated price paid for recent import of 147,000 cubic feet, cost of power from LNG would be higher than that produced from furnace oil.
Nepra recently determined upfront tariff based on imported LNG. Nepra’s assumed cost of USD 12 per mmBTU for imported LNG is higher than the present cost of power from furnace oil. IPR also questions the need for government to seek upfront tariff from Nepra. Upfront tariff guarantees return to investor, but do not require them to meet any efficiency or productivity criteria. The parameters for the power plant remain open. “All costs are passed through to the consumer while the power producer receives an assured return,” says the factsheet.
Relying on imported LNG is no different from what took place under the 1994 power policy. That policy brought about change in fuel mix from hydropower to thermal power and gave extensive comfort to the investor. Upfront tariff was part of the 1994 policy.
The core problem with the present power sector is its high cost of production because of high reliance on furnace oil. To overcome this, government must seek lower cost solution not one that increases the cost. Imported LNG, whose input cost is higher than furnace oil, cannot help the power sector. Government must also set right the many governance issues that hobble power supply. IPR estimates that about 30pc of the sector’s revenue is lost at the distribution stage. There are inefficiencies also with transmission and distribution of power. The factsheet opines that reducing the suffering of people and stimulating economy must be at the heart of any new initiative by the government.
This was stated in a factsheet issued Monday by the Institute for Policy Reforms (IPR). IPR has advised the government to learn lessons from the past mistakes. So far, little is known about the import price of LNG. However, based on the estimated price paid for recent import of 147,000 cubic feet, cost of power from LNG would be higher than that produced from furnace oil.
Nepra recently determined upfront tariff based on imported LNG. Nepra’s assumed cost of USD 12 per mmBTU for imported LNG is higher than the present cost of power from furnace oil. IPR also questions the need for government to seek upfront tariff from Nepra. Upfront tariff guarantees return to investor, but do not require them to meet any efficiency or productivity criteria. The parameters for the power plant remain open. “All costs are passed through to the consumer while the power producer receives an assured return,” says the factsheet.
Relying on imported LNG is no different from what took place under the 1994 power policy. That policy brought about change in fuel mix from hydropower to thermal power and gave extensive comfort to the investor. Upfront tariff was part of the 1994 policy.
The core problem with the present power sector is its high cost of production because of high reliance on furnace oil. To overcome this, government must seek lower cost solution not one that increases the cost. Imported LNG, whose input cost is higher than furnace oil, cannot help the power sector. Government must also set right the many governance issues that hobble power supply. IPR estimates that about 30pc of the sector’s revenue is lost at the distribution stage. There are inefficiencies also with transmission and distribution of power. The factsheet opines that reducing the suffering of people and stimulating economy must be at the heart of any new initiative by the government.
-
Prince Harry Reacts As Beatrice, Eugenie's Names Surface In Epstein Emails -
Cyprus Joins European AI Race: What It Means For Greek LLMs And Regional Innovation -
Amazon Soon To Launch 'AI Content' Marketplace, Says Report -
Is AI Reliable For Health Advice? New Study Raises Red Flags -
WhatsApp Web Starts Rolling Out Voice And Video Calling For Beta Users -
Catherine O’Hara’s Cause Of Death Finally Revealed -
Swimmers Gather At Argentina’s Mar Chiquita For World Record Attempt -
Brooklyn Beckham, Nicola New Move Could Leave David, Victoria Reeling -
Anthropic Criticises ChatGPT Ads As OpenAI Begins Testing Advertising In AI Chats -
YouTube Star MrBeast Acquires Step: Redefining Finance For Gen Zs -
Sarah Ferguson Plans Big Move To Cause ‘serious Damage’ To Andrew -
Trump Nears 500 Press Interactions In His Second Term, Surpassing Former President Biden -
Hailee Steinfeld Reveals Her Plans To Return To Music -
Elon Musk Unveils SpaceX Plan For Civilian Moon, Mars Trips -
MTG Commander Banned Update: Wizards Frees Infamous Instant-win Card -
Royal Family Braces For ‘final Blow’ As Andrew Scandal Deepens