Kh Asif submits employer’s letter to IHC
ISLAMABAD: On April 10, an Islamabad High Court (IHC) larger bench had reserved its judgment in a matter where a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Usman Dar sought disqualification of the federal minister for foreign affairs Khawaja Asif on the basis of an Abu Dhabi Iqama.
A larger bench, however, had allowed the parties to submit additional documents if they have. Khawaja Asif here on Monday submitted a letter of an Abu Dhabi company where he is employed. As per letter, Khawaja Asif’s job with International Mechanical & Electrical Co. WLL. is quite flexible and there are no conditions on him to stay there in Abu Dhabi. The company can seek his legal advice via telephone or whenever he comes to UAE. Managing Director of the company, Elias Salloum, has expressed that he is ready to come before any court in Pakistan.
The letter reads, “We hereby confirm that Kh. Muhammad Asif has been the “legal Advisor Private Law’ for the company. The agreement executed with him was a standard document approved by the UAE Government. The agreement was executed to fulfill UAW law, however, the terms stated in the agreement were not the understanding between the parties. The relationship has cordial, with mutual consent and there was no requirement for him to be present in UAE for any period of time and we have been seeking his advice as and when required telephonically and during his planned visit to UAE. Similarly, the agreement was renewed as per UAE law, he became the Management Consultant of the company.”
Asif was paid a fee for his services as per the understanding of the company and himself. Asif was never a full time employee of the company and was not required to stay in UAE as mentioned in the agreement.
There is total flexibility in the UAE after execution of the standard document to agree to any terms with the employees and Consultants of the company and the UAE Government does not interfere in this respect. The HEC three-member larger bench headed by Justice Athar Minallah and comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani had reserved judgment in this matter on April 10.
-
Isla Fisher Shares Why Life Feels 'liberated' After Sacha Baron Cohen Divorce -
Cybercrime: British Man Charged In Dubai For Allegedly Filming Missiles In Breach Of UAE Rules -
Amazon Withdraws From Drone Trade Group 'Prime Air' Over Safety Concerns -
Pentagon Says 'no Chance' Of Renewed Anthropic Negotiations After Legal Dispute Over AI Technology -
King Charles Leaves Harry And Meghan In Shadows Of Palace Drama -
Meghan Markle’s Dissatisfaction From Harry Grows: ‘It Would’ve Given Us More Credibility’ -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Embark On 'exploring' Mission -
Sarah Ferguson’s Plans For A Royal Tell-all That ‘exposes It All’ Gets Rude Awakening -
Royal Snub: Woman Ignores Prince William And Kate Middleton In London -
Kate Middleton Talks About Her Cancer Once More: ‘something I Have To Be A Lot More Conscious’ -
Steve Tisch: Another Powerful Man Bites The Dust Over Epstein Links -
Prince William Takes The Wheel Of RNLI Lifeboat In Unexpected Moment After Visit To Borough Market -
Lloyds Bank Apologizes After Major Data Glitch Hits Customers, Launches Probe Into Data Breach -
Kate Middleton Given Huge Duty By King Charles Ahead Of Key Visit -
Kat Dennings Remembers Anton Yelchin On His 37th Birthday -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Paternity Comes Under Question: ‘Philip Was Never His Father’