Watson critics crank up heat after latest false start
SYDNEY: Australians might have been stunned by the collapse of their much-vaunted batting line-up in the face of brilliant New Zealand bowling at the weekend but the fall of one particular wicket was no surprise to anyone.Shane Watson, batting at number three, had scrapped his way to 23 runs off
By our correspondents
March 03, 2015
SYDNEY: Australians might have been stunned by the collapse of their much-vaunted batting line-up in the face of brilliant New Zealand bowling at the weekend but the fall of one particular wicket was no surprise to anyone.
Shane Watson, batting at number three, had scrapped his way to 23 runs off 30 balls in three-quarters of an hour when he took an almighty heave at a Daniel Vettori delivery and picked out Tim Southee fielding on the legside boundary.
The big Queenslander was certainly not to blame for the skittling that followed but exasperation at his ability to throw away a solid start to an innings was soon surging through the Twittersphere on a wave of bile.
Watson used to take flak for his inability to convert half centuries to centuries but recently his problem has been progressing from scores in the 20s and 30s, when a batsman is considered to have played himself “in”.
The 33-year-old all-rounder divides his compatriots like no other player and calls for him to be dropped from a side expected, by Australians at least, to win a fifth World Cup next month have reached fever pitch.
Australia’s selectors, however, have remained steadfastly loyal to Watson — when he has not been suffering from one of the many soft tissue injuries that have blighted his career.
In the dark days after the 2010-11 Ashes humbling, that loyalty may have been down to a lack of choice, but Mitch Marsh and James Faulkner are now genuine threats to Watson’s position as Australia’s premier all-rounder, in the 50-over format at least.
It is no blind loyalty, however, and his career figures since his one-day international debut in 2002 stand up to the toughest of scrutiny.
“I think they should keep him,” Brian Lara said. “His past performances suggest that at some point in time he is going to come good.”
“He is a handsome player of abundant talent,” Gideon Haigh, the current doyen of Australian cricket writers, wrote of him at the time. “He is also wealthy, pampered, immature and self-involved.”
Shane Watson, batting at number three, had scrapped his way to 23 runs off 30 balls in three-quarters of an hour when he took an almighty heave at a Daniel Vettori delivery and picked out Tim Southee fielding on the legside boundary.
The big Queenslander was certainly not to blame for the skittling that followed but exasperation at his ability to throw away a solid start to an innings was soon surging through the Twittersphere on a wave of bile.
Watson used to take flak for his inability to convert half centuries to centuries but recently his problem has been progressing from scores in the 20s and 30s, when a batsman is considered to have played himself “in”.
The 33-year-old all-rounder divides his compatriots like no other player and calls for him to be dropped from a side expected, by Australians at least, to win a fifth World Cup next month have reached fever pitch.
Australia’s selectors, however, have remained steadfastly loyal to Watson — when he has not been suffering from one of the many soft tissue injuries that have blighted his career.
In the dark days after the 2010-11 Ashes humbling, that loyalty may have been down to a lack of choice, but Mitch Marsh and James Faulkner are now genuine threats to Watson’s position as Australia’s premier all-rounder, in the 50-over format at least.
It is no blind loyalty, however, and his career figures since his one-day international debut in 2002 stand up to the toughest of scrutiny.
“I think they should keep him,” Brian Lara said. “His past performances suggest that at some point in time he is going to come good.”
“He is a handsome player of abundant talent,” Gideon Haigh, the current doyen of Australian cricket writers, wrote of him at the time. “He is also wealthy, pampered, immature and self-involved.”
-
King Charles Speaks Out Over Andrew's Scandal: 'Stand Ready To Help Police' -
Dax Shepard Recalls Horrifying Accident That Almost Killed Him -
Logan Paul's Bodyguard Hits Fan On Super Bowl Day -
Epstein Files: Anne Hathaway Mentioned As Highly Desired Guest For Bill Gates? -
Prince Harry Under A Lot Of Stress As Meghan Markle Makes Bizarre Demands -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie's Subtle Break From Disgraced Parents Exposed -
Baby Left In Running Bathtub Dies After Father ‘forgets’ Him -
King Charles Takes A Major Step To Keep Horrified Prince William Out Of The Loop On Andrew: Insider -
Taylor Swift Set To Make Biggest Cut From Her Wedding Guest: Blake Lively Or Ryan Reynolds -
Prince William Meets Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman -
Brooklyn Beckham Brutally Cuts Off Inner Circle Amid Feud With David, Victoria -
Kaley Cuoco Reveals Why Fiance Tom Pelphrey Sleeps In Seperate Room -
Ghislaine Maxwell Will Not Answer Congress Questions On Epstein -
Kensington Palace Announces Prince William's Arrival In Saudi Arabia -
‘Andrew Crisis Follows King Charles Everywhere Now’ -
Jennifer Aniston Already Decided Her Wedding Dress?