Lawmakers can’t campaign in by-polls: SC
Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Mian Saqib Nisar sets aside two orders of LHC
By our correspondents
October 14, 2015
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside two orders of the Lahore High Court (LHC) that allowed members of the National Assembly and provincial assemblies to campaign in their constituencies for the upcoming local government elections.
A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, referred the case to the LHC with the direction to club both the petitions as the issue involved was the same in both the petitions.
The court directed the registrar of the LHC to fix the case before a bench next week, while the high court was also directed to decide the matter within one month.
Appearing on notice, Raja Ibrahim Satti, advocate, counsel for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), submitted before the court that the high court judges had ignored the apex court’s orders.
The LHC had suspended the ECP’s May 7 notification which barred the MNAs/MPAs from entering their constituencies for the by-polls and the local government elections.On September 8, the apex court hearing the ECP’s May 25 plea had suspended the LHC’s order and restored the commission’s code of conduct.
Despite the SC’s order, the high court on September 22 again declared the ECP’s notification, which had barred members of the national and provincial assemblies from participating in election campaigns for the by-elections, null and void.
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on October 9 had filed a statement before the Supreme Court and contended that arraying the members of the National Assembly and provincial assembly with the prime minister, chief minister and ministers in the notification was clearly malafide on the part of the ECP. It was further submitted that the MNAs and MPAs do not hold any official or government position, therefore, they could not fall in the category of those who are in power like the PM and CM.
The statement alleged that the ECP, while issuing the notification, had Imran Khan in mind because he was perhaps the only MNA having no government position and would matter the most with the voters in the by-elections because of his immense popularity.
A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, referred the case to the LHC with the direction to club both the petitions as the issue involved was the same in both the petitions.
The court directed the registrar of the LHC to fix the case before a bench next week, while the high court was also directed to decide the matter within one month.
Appearing on notice, Raja Ibrahim Satti, advocate, counsel for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), submitted before the court that the high court judges had ignored the apex court’s orders.
The LHC had suspended the ECP’s May 7 notification which barred the MNAs/MPAs from entering their constituencies for the by-polls and the local government elections.On September 8, the apex court hearing the ECP’s May 25 plea had suspended the LHC’s order and restored the commission’s code of conduct.
Despite the SC’s order, the high court on September 22 again declared the ECP’s notification, which had barred members of the national and provincial assemblies from participating in election campaigns for the by-elections, null and void.
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on October 9 had filed a statement before the Supreme Court and contended that arraying the members of the National Assembly and provincial assembly with the prime minister, chief minister and ministers in the notification was clearly malafide on the part of the ECP. It was further submitted that the MNAs and MPAs do not hold any official or government position, therefore, they could not fall in the category of those who are in power like the PM and CM.
The statement alleged that the ECP, while issuing the notification, had Imran Khan in mind because he was perhaps the only MNA having no government position and would matter the most with the voters in the by-elections because of his immense popularity.
-
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein -
Jessie J Addresses Pregnancy Rumors After Sporting Belly Bump -
Channing Tatum Leaves Fans Scratching Their Heads With Message About South Korea -
Emma Roberts Stars In 'A Body In The Woods' -
'Our Estrangements Can Kill Us': Meghan's Co-star Weighs In On Anthony Hopkins Interview