LAHORE: Pakistan stands at a critical crossroads where restoring macroeconomic stability is no longer a matter of choice but one of necessity. Years of fiscal mismanagement, low tax compliance, unaffordable subsidies and systemic corruption have brought the economy to the brink.
Now, under the guidance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the country is attempting to reverse course through painful -- but essential -- reforms. While recent tax hikes and utility tariff increases may appear unjust to many, they are arguably the only viable option left to avert economic collapse.
A key weakness in Pakistan’s fiscal framework is its failure to broaden the tax base. The state’s inability to bring powerful tax evaders -- particularly among traders, retailers, real estate actors, and parts of the export sector -- into the net has forced it to extract more revenue from the already compliant. The formal and salaried segments, whose taxes are deducted at source, continue to bear a disproportionate share. For instance, salaried individuals contributed Rs585 billion in income tax last fiscal year -- several times more than what was collected from the vast and largely undocumented trading sector.
Even within the formal economy, underreporting is rampant. Many registered businesses declare only a fraction of their actual revenues and profits. In response, the government has stepped up enforcement through digital invoicing, point-of-sale integration, audits, and restrictions on non-filers. These measures, although backed by parliamentary approval, have encountered fierce resistance. Protests, shutdowns, and lobbying have become routine.
Energy sector reform, another frequent flashpoint, has involved rationalising electricity tariffs in line with IMF conditions to rein in circular debt. To shield the poorest, consumers using up to 200 units of electricity per month have been granted significant relief. However, a sharp increase in tariffs applies beyond this threshold, in a bid to discourage wasteful consumption and target subsidies more effectively. Households near the 200-unit mark are now making strenuous efforts to stay under the limit -- underscoring the financial and psychological pressure on low- and middle-income families.
Despite targeted relief measures, many view the reforms as unfair, especially when set against the extravagant lifestyles and minimal tax contributions of the elite. The burden is indeed not equitably shared. Yet further delay would only make eventual corrections more painful. Pakistan urgently needs to boost domestic revenue, reduce its dependence on borrowing, and restore investor and lender confidence. These objectives require fiscal discipline and shared sacrifice.
The backlash from businessmen, traders and transporters -- traditionally influential in Pakistan’s political economy -- has grown louder. But their persistent resistance to transparency and equitable taxation undermines the foundations of an inclusive economy. Their demands for exemptions, under-invoicing, and undocumented cash transactions are no longer tenable in an economy plagued by mounting debt and a weakening currency.
What Pakistan needs now is not populism or short-term appeasement, but structural reform. These fiscal policies must be matched by improvements in governance, a crackdown on corruption, judicial support for tax enforcement, and incentives for compliance. Only then can the tax burden be distributed more fairly.
The current fiscal measures may be harsh, but they are both necessary and long overdue. The road to recovery will be difficult, but retreating now risks a full-blown financial meltdown. All stakeholders -- including the protesting sectors -- must recognise their role in shaping a sustainable economic future.
