US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -- an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.
The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.
The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.
Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.
“This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.
“The Court´s role is not ´to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic´ (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees,” Roberts said.
“It does not. Questions regarding the law´s policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.”
The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution´s Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.
Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.
While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.
Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it “sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine.”
“Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus,” the AAP said.
“Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity.”
-
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine -
Ben Affleck Argues In Favour Of His Shirtless Scene In 'The Rip' -
Mississippi Postal Worker Arrested After Complaints Of Marijuana Odour In Letters -
Canada, China Lock Initial Trade Deal On ‘EV,Canola’ To Strengthen Ties: What To Expect Next? -
Melissa Leo On Euphoria Of Winning An Oscar Vs It's Impact On Career -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Express 'hope' In Latest Major Statement -
Sophie Turner Backs Archie Madekwe As BAFTA Announces Nominees -
Jason Momoa Cherishes Hosting Ozzy Osbourne's Final Gig Ahead Of His Death -
Real Reason Timothee Chalamet Thanked Kylie Jenner At Awards Revealed -
Will King Charles Attend Funeral Of Prince Philip's First Cousin, Princess Irene? -
'Furious' Prince William Wants Andrew As Far Away As Possible