BJP accuses Rahul of ‘treason’ over ‘surrender’ remark
Congress MP Jairam Ramesh took to social media to target government’s global outreach initiative
KARACHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of committing an act “no less than treason” by branding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s foreign policy a “surrender” in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor.
On Wednesday, BJP President J P Nadda said Gandhi’s remarks were an insult to the Indian armed forces and tantamount to echoing Pakistani propaganda.
“This is no less than treason”, Nadda posted on X (formerly Twitter). “Rahul Gandhi, you, your party and your leaders might have surrendered because this has been your history, but Bharat never surrenders.”
In a series of sharp posts, Nadda accused the Congress party of a legacy of capitulation: “Surrender is in your party Congress’ dictionary, it is in your DNA... You surrendered to terrorism, surrendered in Sharm-al-Sheikh, surrendered at the table in Shimla after winning the 1971 war, surrendered in the Indus Water Treaty... and even surrendered to the Muslim League at the time of independence of the country.”
Echoing Nadda’s sentiments, BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi escalated the attack in a press conference, branding Gandhi as “Rahul Munir” and “Rahul Sharif” and claiming the Congress leader had gone further than even Pakistan’s top leadership in allegedly undermining India’s position.
The BJP’s counteroffensive came in response to increasing criticism from the Congress and other INDIA bloc parties over the Indian government’s handling of foreign affairs, the Pahalgam terror attack, and what they see as an opaque and manipulated narrative around Operation Sindoor.
On Wednesday night, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh took to social media to target the government’s global outreach initiative. Referring to the External Affairs Minister (EAM), Ramesh wrote: “Tomorrow, the unusually low-profile EAM is meeting with some MP delegations that have returned. Hope there will be an honest assessment of what was actually accomplished -- not what was spin doctored. There are reliable reports that the welcome in some countries was very lukewarm -- to put it mildly -- and that the political value of the people the MPs met was below par. Videos of the MPs engaging in silly fun and frolic while on a serious national mission have also been surfacing.”
Earlier the same day, Ramesh had criticised the government’s scheduling of the upcoming monsoon session of parliament, calling it a tactic to avoid convening a special session as demanded by the opposition. “Never before in India’s parliamentary history has a session been announced 47 days in advance”, he said. “Why was Operation Sindoor stopped suddenly after four days? Why did President Trump repeat 12 times in 20 days that the ceasefire happened because of him? These are the questions the prime minister does not want to answer.”
Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had announced that the monsoon session will commence on July 21 and continue till August 12. It will be the first session since Operation Sindoor.
The demand for a special session was also amplified by Samajwadi Party MP Rajeev Rai, who was part of an all-party delegation sent by India that recently visited five countries -- Russia, Slovenia, Greece, Latvia and Spain. “PM should have called the special session by himself”, Rai told ANI. “In 1962, when the war against China was at its climax, first-time MP Atal Bihari Vajpayee had demanded a special session mid-war. Nehru ji had called the special session then... We followed the ‘rashtra dharma’, but the government should follow ‘raj dharma’.” Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday reiterated the opposition’s call for a special session to address key national concerns, including the Pahalgam attack.Adding fuel to the fire, Congress leader Pawan Khera alleged that India was isolated diplomatically following the operation. “In the Modi government, all policies within the country are being run by trolls, and the foreign policy abroad is being managed by a person who has surrendered”, he posted on social media. He claimed that India’s diplomatic standing had weakened, citing Kuwait’s move to lift visa restrictions on Pakistan and its subsequent agreement with Pakistan on labour issues. “That’s why they say -- ‘Name Narendra, work surrender’”, Khera wrote.
-
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine -
Ben Affleck Argues In Favour Of His Shirtless Scene In 'The Rip' -
Mississippi Postal Worker Arrested After Complaints Of Marijuana Odour In Letters -
Canada, China Lock Initial Trade Deal On ‘EV,Canola’ To Strengthen Ties: What To Expect Next? -
Melissa Leo On Euphoria Of Winning An Oscar Vs It's Impact On Career -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Express 'hope' In Latest Major Statement -
Sophie Turner Backs Archie Madekwe As BAFTA Announces Nominees -
Jason Momoa Cherishes Hosting Ozzy Osbourne's Final Gig Ahead Of His Death -
Real Reason Timothee Chalamet Thanked Kylie Jenner At Awards Revealed -
Will King Charles Attend Funeral Of Prince Philip's First Cousin, Princess Irene? -
'Furious' Prince William Wants Andrew As Far Away As Possible