CII rejects child marriage restraint bill as contrary to Islam
CII meeting, while pointing out some problems in under-age marriages, observed that trend should be discouraged
ISLAMABAD: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) on Tuesday rejected the Child Marriage Restraint Bill, 2025 which fixes minimum age for marriage at 18, terming the legislation passed by the National Assembly and Senate against Islam.
“The CII at its meeting termed the Child Marriage Restraint Bill which was moved by Sharmila Faruqui MNA in the National Assembly as un-Islamic,” an official statement issued by the CII media wing after the meeting said.
The participants of the meeting chaired by Dr. Raghib Hussain Naeemi maintained that clauses of the Child Marriage Restraint bill, 2025, fixing the age limit for marriage and declaring marriage below age of 18 as child abuse and punishment for committing the act, do not conform with the Islamic injunctions.
The CII meeting, while pointing out some problems in under-age marriages, also observed that the trend should be discouraged. “However, the CII meeting as a whole rejected the bill terming the same as un-Islamic,” the CII statement said. The meeting also noted that the bill was not referred to the CII to seek Council’s opinion and review.
Similarly, the CII meeting on Tuesday also termed that draft of a similar bill titled Child Marriage Restraining Bill, which was referred to the Council by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government, clashes with the Islamic injunctions.
The CII also decided that Thalassemia screening before marriage should not be declared as compulsory rather it should be an option for both sides. “In light of Islamic teachings, no complications
should be involved in the process of Nikah,” the CII meeting observed stressing that an awareness campaign could be more effective instead.
The CII meeting also held discussions with regard to irresponsible reporting in media on courts’ decisions and expressed concern in this connection. In this regard, the CII members referred to irresponsible reporting on Lahore High Court’s decision on Khula.
On the issue of dowry, the CII meeting also declared that demanding dowry or forcing family of bride for the purpose was against Islamic teachings and injunctions. The CII called upon parents to take decision with regard to rituals, marriages, etc, in the light of Islamic teachings.
On a query from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the CII declared that it should be discretion of a woman whether she wants to apply for domicile of his husband’s native district after marriage or keep the domicile which she got before marriage.
The meeting also constituted a committee to make the Auqaf department as more effective and dynamic. The committee would submit its recommendations after going through department’s performance and its administrative structure.
The CII meeting also formed another committee to prepare a comprehensive draft of Muslim Family Laws. The meeting also proposed amendment to clause 7 of the Muslim Family (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The meeting also declared that a divorced woman on completion of ‘Iddat Period” cannot claim ‘Nan Nufqa’. The CII also negated the concept of Matrimonial.
-
Pentagon Threatens To Cut Ties With Anthropic Over AI Safeguards Dispute -
Meghan Markle's Father Shares Fresh Health Update -
Travis Kelce Takes Hilarious Jab At Taylor Swift In Valentine’s Day Post -
NASA Confirms Arrival Of SpaceX Crew-12 Astronauts At The International Space Station -
Can AI Bully Humans? Bot Publicly Criticises Engineer After Code Rejection -
Search For Savannah Guthrie’s Abducted Mom Enters Unthinkable Phase -
Imagine Dragons Star, Dan Reynolds Recalls 'frustrating' Diagnosis -
Steve Jobs Once Called Google Over Single Shade Of Yellow: Here’s Why -
Barack Obama Addresses UFO Mystery: Aliens Are ‘real’ But Debunks Area 51 Conspiracy Theories -
Selma Blair Explains Why Multiple Sclerosis 'isn't So Scary' -
Will Smith Surprises Wife Jada Pinkett With Unusual Gift On Valentine's Day -
Shamed Andrew Has Paid Royal Favours With ‘national Scandal’ -
Prince William Ticked Off By How Andrew ‘behaved With Staff’ -
Prince William Questions Himself ‘what’s The Point’ After Saudi Trip -
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress