IHC judge reserves judgment on appeal against tribunal’s decision to send back deputation judges
Justice Arbab said judges who were elevated from high court to SC also issued reserved decisions later
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court has reserved its judgment on an appeal against the decision of the Islamabad District Judicial Service Tribunal to send back judges who came on deputation.
The court inquired the law officer to apprise it of the number of judges in Islamabad’s subordinate judiciary and judges who were working on deputation. After hearing the arguments of the parties, the court directed the amicus curiae to submit his arguments in writing.
The Islamabad High Court’s Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir heard the case against the decision of the Islamabad District Judicial Service Tribunal with regard to sending back judges who came on deputation to the subordinate judiciary.
Advocate General Islamabad Ayaz Shaukat said that when the notification of the new tribunal was issued on March 18, the old tribunal came to an end. The old tribunal issued a summary decision in the case on March 21.
The high court observed that it has to examine whether the tribunal had the authority to make that order or not. Justice Arbab Tahir said that the tribunal has written that they had already reserved the decision.
The court observed that the tribunal is equal to the civil court and the civil court does not have the authority to nullify any law. After the new notification, the tribunal, which does not exist, could not have made the order.
Justice Arbab Tahir said judges who were elevated from the high court to the Supreme Court also issued reserved decisions later.
The lawyer for the petitioner judge said that there has been a demand for the transfer of judges from Islamabad to other provinces. Judges of provinces are constantly transferred within the province, but judges of Islamabad are not transferred.
The court inquired the counsel whether he is saying problems arise due to a judge staying in one place permanently and the judge’s personal likes and dislikes are involved. It reserved the decision after hearing the arguments.
-
Savannah Guthrie Sends Desperate Plea To Mom Nancy Kidnapper -
NBA All-Star 2026 Shake-up: Inside The New USA Vs World Tournament Format -
Warner Bros Consider Reopening Deal Talks With Paramount, Says Reports -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Faces Future With UK MPs, Says Expert -
Shamed Andrew Told 'nobody Is Above The Law' Amid Harrowing Silence -
Gisele Bundchen Melts Hearts With Sweet Bike Ride Glimpse Featuring Son -
Prince William Found Meghan Markle ‘quite Refreshing’ At Start -
Kate Middleton Knew Should Could Not Be ‘voice Of Reason’ With Prince Harry -
Rihanna Has Wardrobe Malfunction At A$AP Rocky Fashion Show -
Prince Harry Felt System Had ‘one Rule For Him, One For Prince William’ -
Jake Paul's Fiancée Sends Him Over The Moon Over Stunning Victory -
Harper Beckham Sends Valentine’s Love Amid Brooklyn Family Drama -
Why Prince William, Kate Middleton 'partnership' Is Important For Monarchy -
Katie Price Drama Escalates As Family Stays In Touch With Ex JJ Slater -
Critics Target Palace Narrative After Andrew's Controversy Refuses To Die -
Sarah Ferguson’s Delusions Take A Turn For The Worse: ‘She’s Been Deserted’