High court has suo motu powers in criminal revision: SC
Bench remarked that HC cannot turn blind eye if injustice is being done
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday observed that in criminal revision, the high court has suo motu powers.
A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar and comprising Justice Salahuddin Panhwar and Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, heard various appeals of the Punjab government against bail granted to accused in May 9 cases.
The bench while hearing the appeal against Sanam Javed acquittal remarked that the high court cannot turn a blind eye if injustice is being done.
During the hearing, Punjab government lawyer informed the court that Sanam Javed had filed a petition against her remand in the Lahore High Court (LHC), adding that the LHC had acquitted the accused. Justice Kakar noted that in these cases, the court had already ordered decisions within four months. “Why do you want to pursue this case now,” Justice Kakar asked the counsel. The counsel replied that the LHC exceeded its authority and acquitted the accused.
Justice Kakar reminded the Punjab government counsel that he has already given a verdict, declaring that the high court had full authority. He continued that if the LHC even receives a letter about injustice, it can act on that. “The high court cannot turn a blind eye if an injustice is being done,” he emphasised. The Punjab government counsel, however, contended that the LHC cannot use suo motu powers. At this, Justice Salahuddin Panwar remarked that in criminal revision, the high court even has suo motu powers. “After a year you remembered that the accused had committed a crime,” Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim observed pointing to the Punjab government counsel.
“Tomorrow, you might add me or someone else to the May 9 cases,” Justice Ibrahim remarked.
Sanam Javed’s counsel told the court they had filed for acquittal along with the remand petition. “You know the legal status of a co-accused’s confession,” added Justice Kakar. Later, the court adjourned the hearing for date-in-office.
Meanwhile, the bench also heard Sheikh Rashid’s acquittal appeal in the GHQ attack case. The Punjab government requested time to present evidence in its appeal against Sheikh Rashid’s acquittal. The court, however, admonished the special prosecutor for seeking a delay.
Justice Kakar remarked that this court would only decide according to the law. “Even if the sky falls or the earth shakes, nothing will deviate from the law in this court,” he asserted. Later, the court adjourned the hearing until next week.
-
Prince Harry Warns Meghan Markle To 'step Back' -
Selena Gomez Explains Why She Thought Lupus Was 'life-or-death' -
New Zealand Flood Crisis: State Of Emergency Declared As North Island Braces For More Storms -
Nancy Guthrie Case: Mystery Deepens As Unknown DNA Found At Property -
James Van Der Beek's Brother Breaks Silence On Actor's Tragic Death -
Megan Thee Stallion On New Romance With Klay Thompson: 'I'm Comfy' -
Nicole Kidman Celebrates Galentine’s Day Months After Keith Urban Split -
Justin Bieber Unveils Hailey Bieber As First Face Of SKYLRK In Intimate Campaign Debut -
Caitlin O’Connor Says Fiance Joe Manganiello Has Changed Valentine’s Day For Her -
Rachel Zoe Sends Out Message For Womne With Her Post-divorce Diamond Ring -
James Van Der Beek's Final Conversation With Director Roger Avary Laid Bare: 'We Cried' -
Jaden Smith Walks Out Of Interview After Kanye West Question At Film Premiere -
Michelle Obama Gets Candid About Spontaneous Decision At Piercings Tattoo -
Why Halle Berry Wasn't Ready For Marriage After Van Hunt Popped Question? Source -
Bunnie Xo Shares Raw Confession After Year-long IVF Struggle -
Brooks Nader Reveals Why She Quit Fillers After Years