SC asks if super tax will remain in force forever
Initial estimate was to collect Rs80 billion, but it is unclear how much government has collected under tax to-date
ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court Judge Muhammad Ali Mazhar Tuesday asked whether the Super Tax, once imposed for a specific time, will remain in force forever.
A five-member constitutional bench of the apex court — headed by Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan — heard the matter related to Super Tax.
Replying to a query, Makhdoom Ali Khan, counsel for the companies, submitted that the government should be asked how much tax had been collected so far under the Super Tax.
He submitted that the government had introduced the Super Tax in 2015 and its purpose was rehabilitation of the areas affected by Operation Zarb-e-Azb. He further submitted that the tax was imposed through the 2015 Finance Bill, and it remained in effect from 2015 to 2022.
The initial estimate was to collect Rs80 billion, but it is unclear how much the government has collected under the tax to-date.
Justice Jamal Mandokhail inquired about the government’s plan for the rehabilitation of affected areas and whether any estimate had been made for this purpose. He also questioned whether a tax on services could be imposed through a finance bill.
In response, Makhdoom Ali Khan argued that the government was already collecting income tax and that the Super Tax was introduced to avoid double taxation. He also pointed out that social welfare had now become a provincial responsibility.
The counsel further submitted that the Super Tax was imposed for only one year adding that the finance minister never disclosed the details about its recovery or expenditure. The counsel submitted that the government should be asked how much revenue was collected under the Super Tax.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar repeated that the Super Tax was imposed once for a specific purpose and asked whether it was supposed to last indefinitely. Makhdoom Ali Khan further argued that the rehabilitation of areas affected by operations was a matter of local and provincial governments.
Justice Aminuddin Khan questioned how funds from the national exchequer could be spent without the provinces’ consent.
During the hearing, Raza Rabbani, the counsel for the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), submitted that the war against terrorism was an ongoing process and that people had been displaced as a result of counter-terrorism operations. Makhdoom Ali Khan countered by asking whether terrorism had officially ended in 2020, as the government had stopped collecting the Super Tax that year.
Justice Mandokhail observed that Super Tax was intended for the rehabilitation of those affected by military operations, but in reality the country still faced terrorism daily. He then asked how many people had been displaced and from which areas. Later, the court adjourned the hearing for today (Wednesday).
-
Relieve Eczema Symptoms This Winter With Simple Steps -
Prince Harry Faces Marital Tensions As King Charles Offers Olive Branch -
South Korea, Italy Strengthen Ties To Bolster AI Technology, Business, Defence Cooperation -
Elon Musk Shares Crucial Advice As China’s Birth Rate Hits Record Low Since 1949 -
Kelly Clarkson Finally Quitting Morning Show? -
'Confident' Prince Harry Breaks Silence After Returning To Britain -
James Gunn Reveals What Caused Wonder Woman Casting Rumors -
Tesla Emerges Early Winner As Canada Welcomes Chinese EVs: Here’s Why -
New Hope For People With Obesity As Failed Drug Offers Cure -
Prince Harry Considering ‘half-in, Half-out’ Royal Role Amid UK Trip? -
CBS Finally Airs Trump’s Full Interview 'pulled' Earlier After White House Threatens To Sue -
Robert Irwin Gets Honest About Being In South Africa After 'DWTS' Run In LA -
Queen Elizabeth’s Icy Response To Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein Scandal Revealed -
Trump Vows To Neutralize ‘Russian Threat’ From Greenland, Raising Arctic Stakes -
Green Day Revealed As Super Bowl 2026 Opening Act -
Trump's Greenland Tariff ‘blackmail’ Sparks EU Retaliation: Is ‘trade Bazooka’ Next?