No one can interfere in or comment on judicial proceedings: SC
Justice Athar further remarks that no one in world could comment on judicial proceedings
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Friday questioned the interviews conducted by the media representatives with regard to the pending criminal cases and held that no one could interfere in a fair trial and no one in the world could comment on the judicial proceedings.
This observation from the top court came during the hearing of an appeal in a murder case by a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Athar Minallah.
The counsel for the accused told the court that when the case was pending trial, a media representative in his story declared the accused guilty of murder in light of his investigation.
Justice Athar, however, questioned the importance of the media person’s interview in a criminal case and remarked that no one could interfere in a fair trial of criminal proceedings.
He further remarked that no one in the world could comment on the judicial proceedings.
“If the accused is on remand, even the court cannot intervene,” Justice Minallah added.
Justice Irfan Saadat Khan asked if now the executions will take place on the basis of interviews of media persons.
Justice Athar remarked that evidence was collected in a criminal case and no one could intervene except the investigating officer.
Later, the court issued notices to the attorney general, advocate general Punjab and the prosecutor general and adjourned the hearing until January 27.
The accused Shahid Ali was sentenced to death by the trial court for killing a child, Wasim Akram, in Karachi. The accused confessed to the crime in a media interview, but later on denied his statement before the magistrate. The accused was sentenced to death by the trial court after relying on the media interview. The Sindh High Court also upheld the decision of the trial court, against which the accused filed the appeal with the Supreme Court.
-
'Buffy' Star Nicholas Brendon's Death Case Takes Massive Turn -
FKA Twigs Takes Legal Stand Against Ex Shia LaBeouf -
‘Progressive’ Kate Middleton Snubs Outdated Royal Etiquette -
Kylie Kelce Explains Why She Avoids Raising Kids With 'silver Spoon' -
Meghan Markle Is Above Royal Family ‘empty Threats,’ Says Insider -
Anne Hathaway Opens Up About 'defeated' Feeling As Working Mom -
Shamed Andrew Should Testify In Epstein Case As ‘act Of Service’ -
What Really Happened Before Nicholas Brendon Was Found Dead At Home? -
Sarah Ferguson Branded ‘most Famous Missing Person’ In UK Right Now -
Why King Charles Does Not Need A Driving License? Expert Reveals -
Did Graham Norton Really Sign NDAs For Taylor Swift’s Wedding? -
‘Polite’ King Charles Treats Staff Better Than ‘boorish’ Andrew -
Princess Beatrice's Husband Raises Eyebrows With Deleted Instagram Post -
Dua Lipa 'snubs' Priyanka Chopra -
Will Taylor Frankie Paul Still Get Her 'Bachelorette' Salary? -
'Harry Potter' Returns: First Glimpse Of HBO's New Series