PHC suspends IT professional allowance of Secretariat employees
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Saturday suspended the payment of IT professional allowance to employees of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Secretariat and other departments receiving allowances and asked the provincial government to submit a reply in the instant case.
The bench issued these orders during the hearing of a petition filed by the PHC employees against the freezing of the IT allowance.
The two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Kamran Hayat Miankhel heard the petition.
The petitioners’ lawyer Roohul Amin informed the court that since 2021, the IT allowance had not been paid to the employees working in the IT section of the PHC, while employees in other departments were receiving this allowance along with other benefits.
The provincial government’s stance, he pleaded, was that since the PHC employees were already receiving various allowances, the IT allowance cannot be provided to them.
He contended that employees in various other departments, including the Secretariat, were receiving both the relevant allowances and the IT professional allowance. However, the employees of the PHC were being ignored in this regard.
Upon this, the secretary Finance informed the court that a committee had been formed to resolve this issue and would make the final decision.
In response, the petitioners’ lawyer questioned whether this committee was being formed only for the PHC employees or would also include other departments, as employees of several other departments were already receiving the IT allowance, which was discriminatory against high court employees.
The court noted that the Finance Department had suspended the allowance for PHC employees on the grounds that they were already receiving judicial and other allowances, therefore, the IT allowance could not be provided.
However, if employees in other departments, such as those in the Secretariat, were receiving other allowances, their IT allowance payments should also be suspended until further orders.
The court postponed the hearing and directed the relevant authorities to submit their responses.
-
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones -
Teyana Taylor Reflects On Her Friendship With Julia Roberts -
Bright Green Comet C/2024 E1 Nears Closest Approach Before Leaving Solar System -
Meghan Markle Warns Prince Harry As Royal Family Lands In 'biggest Crises' Since Death Of Princess Diana -
Elon Musk Weighs Parenthood Against AI Boom, Sparking Public Debate -
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles'