PBC, SCBA reject ordinance amending SC practice, procedure law
“This is a bad law and detrimental to independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights for which Article 184(3) of Constitution is invoked by an aggrieved person” Naek said
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), apex bodies of lawyers, have rejected the promulgation of the ordinance amending the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023, terming the ordinance as bad law, detrimental to the independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights.
In separate statements issued here on Saturday, PBC Vice Chairman Farooq H Naek said that the ordinance is an unjust law and violates the democratic procedure for formation of Bench under Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023. “This is a bad law and detrimental to the independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights for which Article 184(3) of the Constitution is invoked by an aggrieved person,” Naek said.
Naek said that it was a longstanding demand of the Pakistan Bar Council and legal community that a committee of senior judges should be constituted to decide constitution of benches and fixation of cases, and the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act, 2023 was the outcome of the struggle of the legal fraternity and lawyers who welcomed and appreciated when this Act was enacted. “But now amendment to the said Act through the ordinance is a clear defiance of the long-standing struggle of lawyers,” Naek maintained, adding that the legislation had already been upheld by the Supreme Court.
Similarly, SCBA President Muhammad Shahzad Shaukat, along with Secretary Syed Ali Imran, expressed remorse and anguish on the promulgation of the ordinance. The ordinance is a clear defiance of the longstanding struggle of legal fraternity which culminated in the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023. They expressed their deep concern at the timing and manner in which the ordinance had been issued and the fact that it practically amounts to repeal of the Act, which is unacceptable particularly when the said legislation had already been upheld by the Supreme Court.
They said that sacred institutions like parliament and judiciary are on a collision course which is destined to have devastating effects on democracy and supremacy of Constitution, if both sides do not exercise restrain it can derail the whole system.
-
King Charles' Andrew Decision Labelled 'long Overdue' -
Timothee Chalamet 'forever Indebted' To Fan Over Kind Gesture -
Columbia University Sacks Staff Over Epstein Partner's ‘backdoor’ Admission -
Ozzy Osbourne's Family Struggles Behind Closed Doors -
Dua Lipa Claims Long-distance Relationship 'never Stops Being Hard' -
BTS Moments Of Taylor Swift's 'Opalite' Music Video Unvieled: See Photos -
Robin Windsor's Death: Kate Beckinsale Says It Was Preventable Tragedy -
Rachel Zoe Shares Update On Her Divorce From Rodger Berman -
Kim Kardashian Officially Takes Major Step In Romance With New Boyfriend Lewis Hamilton -
YouTube Tests Limiting ‘All’ Notifications For Inactive Channel Subscribers -
'Isolated And Humiliated' Andrew Sparks New Fears At Palace -
Google Tests Refreshed Live Updates UI Ahead Of Android 17 -
Ohio Daycare Worker 'stole $150k In Payroll Scam', Nearly Bankrupting Nursery -
Michelle Yeoh Gets Honest About 'struggle' Of Asian Representation In Hollywood -
Slovak Fugitive Caught At Milano-Cortina Olympics To Watch Hockey -
King Charles Receives Exciting News About Reunion With Archie, Lilibet