PBC, SCBA reject ordinance amending SC practice, procedure law
“This is a bad law and detrimental to independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights for which Article 184(3) of Constitution is invoked by an aggrieved person” Naek said
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), apex bodies of lawyers, have rejected the promulgation of the ordinance amending the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023, terming the ordinance as bad law, detrimental to the independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights.
In separate statements issued here on Saturday, PBC Vice Chairman Farooq H Naek said that the ordinance is an unjust law and violates the democratic procedure for formation of Bench under Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023. “This is a bad law and detrimental to the independence of judiciary and protection of fundamental rights for which Article 184(3) of the Constitution is invoked by an aggrieved person,” Naek said.
Naek said that it was a longstanding demand of the Pakistan Bar Council and legal community that a committee of senior judges should be constituted to decide constitution of benches and fixation of cases, and the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act, 2023 was the outcome of the struggle of the legal fraternity and lawyers who welcomed and appreciated when this Act was enacted. “But now amendment to the said Act through the ordinance is a clear defiance of the long-standing struggle of lawyers,” Naek maintained, adding that the legislation had already been upheld by the Supreme Court.
Similarly, SCBA President Muhammad Shahzad Shaukat, along with Secretary Syed Ali Imran, expressed remorse and anguish on the promulgation of the ordinance. The ordinance is a clear defiance of the longstanding struggle of legal fraternity which culminated in the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023. They expressed their deep concern at the timing and manner in which the ordinance had been issued and the fact that it practically amounts to repeal of the Act, which is unacceptable particularly when the said legislation had already been upheld by the Supreme Court.
They said that sacred institutions like parliament and judiciary are on a collision course which is destined to have devastating effects on democracy and supremacy of Constitution, if both sides do not exercise restrain it can derail the whole system.
-
5 Celebrities You Didn't Know Have Experienced Depression -
Trump Considers Scaling Back Trade Levies On Steel, Aluminium In Response To Rising Costs -
Claude AI Shutdown Simulation Sparks Fresh AI Safety Concerns -
King Charles Vows Not To Let Andrew Scandal Overshadow His Special Project -
Spotify Says Its Best Engineers No Longer Write Code As AI Takes Over -
Michelle Yeoh Addresses 'Wicked For Good' Snub At 2026 Oscars -
Trump Revokes Legal Basis For US Climate Regulation, Curb Vehicle Emission Standards -
DOJ Blocks Trump Administration From Cutting $600M In Public Health Funds -
2026 Winter Olympics Men Figure Skating: Malinin Eyes Quadruple Axel, After Banned Backflip -
Meghan Markle Rallies Behind Brooklyn Beckham Amid Explosive Family Drama -
Scientists Find Strange Solar System That Breaks Planet Formation Rules -
Backstreet Boys Voice Desire To Headline 2027's Super Bowl Halftime Show -
OpenAI Accuses China’s DeepSeek Of Replicating US Models To Train Its AI -
Woman Calls Press ‘vultures’ Outside Nancy Guthrie’s Home After Tense Standoff -
Allison Holker Gets Engaged To Adam Edmunds After Two Years Of Dating -
Prince William Prioritises Monarchy’s Future Over Family Ties In Andrew Crisis